From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp1 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id cGuQOUGIiV+cOgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:47:13 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp1 with LMTPS id CPdcNUGIiV+RLAAAbx9fmQ (envelope-from ) for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:47:13 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 37C0B94060E for ; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:47:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34650 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTOCU-0006sB-Js for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:47:10 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34024) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTOCM-0006pa-BQ for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:47:02 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:46424) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kTOCM-0002hg-22 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:47:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTOCM-0004Zx-0B for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:47:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#39588] gnu: Add mpich, scalapack-mpich, mumps-mpich, pt-scotch-mpich, python-mpi4py-mpich Resent-From: zimoun Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:47:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 39588 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Maurice =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A9mond?= , 39588@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 39588-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B39588.160284879617563 (code B ref 39588); Fri, 16 Oct 2020 11:47:01 +0000 Received: (at 39588) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Oct 2020 11:46:36 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57970 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTOBv-0004ZD-Mf for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:46:35 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-f181.google.com ([209.85.222.181]:39003) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1kTOBt-0004Yz-K6 for 39588@debbugs.gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 07:46:34 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-f181.google.com with SMTP id k9so1661270qki.6 for <39588@debbugs.gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 04:46:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RcS0J1KJ+knRmrRsZxrIjN06SGwzQu0ZSK5rpVvBypY=; b=Sp2owHT+UxejevHzSz8DoMPBgkijmtYZgrhCnDZiw358fxebsuJ4+Xztu1ke7ygVb3 uMwV+qUMC/6Mfj5Rxl/3+CNHETeD+0+YbfC58sFi/4m3j2yhVJokCZr8K3+l8WWlmpGm 3TQjMn2zijT/FiZWJqtdbZ7deXjzDs1Yzw7T1nXX4sZWUw3Xe6sBUuP9ihBsVlfeS5ah ngHZWqe9ZbZZpzvqWsTMnaVcUxdKASWdxxRNVPkHikQGy0GqN76s+yFJmW47Na0ycrsH 0XZaGQDKZ9soPQDEpU8jVP1D5B9KtedKNj6jXiV4Tnh2zh5c8I4v08WC3fEfcBAZHlUr P5fA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=RcS0J1KJ+knRmrRsZxrIjN06SGwzQu0ZSK5rpVvBypY=; b=p4Zd6ljU7WSWVR+sWfcUZhU4M9n6z0nj0i04h0W9xCV1+T8omgkYIKW7bxroYQhC1U y5Uw5HSWOBH/jdCy5llU9m2I+sH1tCkZHd6NxG6KXXDF4oDY3LK2UfYQCEhPN/E780gT RiJ1kejKKWLCrkRzdpub/gk6caf6C8/TOW2TY2qoKT/e21VDtFzHqMTFAvFM2sWf148l FgcQe/WjAQrgpTStYrHvSdnpkeaZswISpbP5YW1SRC2nie4W6shfApMYFgL1YvWmjtAW v6AWJ4KYSTwBDRa1y1m6AW8TqETLBUTgmQRtXKpySNMXXSPy+yrwD7VhBVa12LyHw8fm IxSg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530b0NgJcBVHXmxUAdS3M379zyJaAX0J4fMXcFctZFTB/YFrsHmc 1HHHHHX/zLWJDuwH6jSzeOW9IpcfAYd2GMrdu/Q= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyPxu20lz6s/Wi5WKA26gKlTpKeEZ0F1XhADwHuSjeBd8MDd1uGv65krBTq8ZSef7yV0BMsSkaljfWCFoMUBjQ= X-Received: by 2002:a37:c56:: with SMTP id 83mr3132766qkm.304.1602848788029; Fri, 16 Oct 2020 04:46:28 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87blq2rclk.fsf@inria.fr> <87o8tx3z2q.fsf@gnu.org> <87eeupd3t1.fsf@gnu.org> <861rhz1d7b.fsf@gmail.com> <87o8l28qjh.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87o8l28qjh.fsf@gnu.org> From: zimoun Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2020 13:46:16 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/) X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-Spam-Score: -1.0 (-) X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Sp2owHT+; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-patches-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 1.59 X-TUID: j2nYFGr/sH+7 Dear, On Fri, 16 Oct 2020 at 11:32, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > Thanks for staying on top of things! :-) I have been a bit upset by recent discussions on French's HPC mailing list about "modulefiles are awesome" ---- well I am sure they are applying variant of "pr=C3=AAcher le faux pour savoir le vrai" [1]. :-) 1: > > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 10:08, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote= : > > Now the =E2=80=9C#:deep?=E2=80=9D exists, does it make sense to impleme= nt this > > =E2=80=9Cpackage-with-mpich=E2=80=9D procedure? It could be helpful fo= r HPC people, > > isn=E2=80=99t? > > Or does =E2=80=98--with-input=3Dopenmpi=3Dmpich=E2=80=99 fit the bill now= ? I do not have an MPI infrastructure or enough CPU power to rebuild a lot at hand to fully test it. If one of you can try on right infra and report, it could be awesome. BTW, it should work only if MPICH does not require extra phases or environment variables. All the best, simon