From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Subject: =?UTF-8?B?UmU6IExldOKAmXMgbWVyZ2Ug4oCYY29yZS11cGRhdGVz4oCZIQ==?=
Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 17:40:01 +0200
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ1YCTm5DEOnsHOdOQTAysaieTrKaApC2yjrnOYCB9nv8Q@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87zhiuksyx.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ3zENKYUjqh4UfxVs7iL_-FCdi89a30S-PqhKqADrYu6g@mail.gmail.com>
 <87sgohfozl.fsf@elephly.net>
 <CAJ3okZ1SjXxSVu904yErqY26eDHuWGTBUTrZE7+1L=1aFKtg4Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <87imp7i9r3.fsf@gnu.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51790)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1iFgjk-0004Cs-Lt
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:40:21 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>) id 1iFgjj-0007fX-Ix
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 02 Oct 2019 11:40:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <87imp7i9r3.fsf@gnu.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Guix Devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

Hi,

On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 15:06, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:

> Could you give us the exact command to reproduce it, with a =E2=80=98--co=
mmit=E2=80=99
> flag and without a ~/.config/guix/channels.scm file, as well as the
> output of =E2=80=98guix describe=E2=80=99 for the =E2=80=98guix=E2=80=99 =
command you=E2=80=99re using?

Sorry the noise.
The culprit was the ~/.config/guix/channels.scm file and my custom
channel has seemed inconsistent.
Basically I did not report the big move of Haskell packages so
'ghc-pandoc' was not found.
 #:use-module (gnu packages haskell) ->  #:use-module (gnu packages haskell=
-xyz)


Sorry again.

All the best,
simon