From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms9.migadu.com with LMTPS id OEPTHxPJ/mTJNAAA9RJhRA:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:00:19 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:403:4789::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id OEPTHxPJ/mTJNAAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:00:19 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2612C41938 for ; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 10:00:19 +0200 (CEST) Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=Ax3mc+F+; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1694419219; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=c89PVX1JzQ7AVZ7psII9DDyL9Se4xRsriODVKpagPB4=; b=tQVsuFmMvIzE1i7QP6v3dqRiPBz0hMmaSoO2GUErBudiJxJ/qhZ8BVfZDsSlM7spIxPfJD GTJc4XW70RkeWr7B3WHazuBU5M+56ZF80cyxrjnTQ2KchO8R+71nJoHByMXi2US6i4lcUq nYSDf5kC7Fk4Mr1+YZD9qRPBgOzSQdfpDZa/MogD+LoA8CvRVCRCVN4lCXTfswIy/bj8OU LSknXeytyjbNZgL+IXRqO65hS+dJPhxTqKP4bCkttO4ZToKCcsQMbtwZhuqxVY3qbJFvjg cEi9MGxlibBctgKe8uCn9Qgf1XGlXsmN4MUQHBNG0Cv3orklZn92WWmFkexRFA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20221208 header.b=Ax3mc+F+; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org"; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none) ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1694419219; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=shPK/QQTNRj76N5AJgm6vdOt3ve5cMuIU9TpFSN5rpvuXgn7GqTQvg9V5165TrPULDtmY/ OnEAmoYSnkuteeSyoaVQBSayQRzQdBItL8j1UhI4mIKT8d6QJdUqGhLyR8ShX/8bw+SEWy 4eMMIMYdjEWRMMEPWencUyx95Cny0sJYfg2ipVybcZZqmnZGuq0p7dQWoEScE8KtlbGjtb jYBL0cQ6i/8I+3+c110VxmrAgSxARpTVHQ1JXbhoiPFpF3jQCgzEkDgo1CU4somc5hbD5L bvV5jJkucn+rC6l+aF2gtEPcfQ6bHomACpNkl2om+diS5IOLWdSzHgPIrED8Og== Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfbpv-0007VA-Ho; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:59:59 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfbpu-0007SB-NP for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:59:58 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1qfbpu-0001YH-F2 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:59:58 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfbpy-00080l-Bb for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 04:00:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#65391: People need to report failing builds even though we have ci.guix.gnu.org for that Resent-From: Simon Tournier Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:00:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 65391 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Csepp Cc: Maxim Cournoyer , Andy Tai , Maxime Devos , =?UTF-8?Q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= , Bruno Victal , 65391@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 65391-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B65391.169441914930692 (code B ref 65391); Mon, 11 Sep 2023 08:00:02 +0000 Received: (at 65391) by debbugs.gnu.org; 11 Sep 2023 07:59:09 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:52046 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfbp6-0007yx-WE for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:59:09 -0400 Received: from mail-lj1-x235.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::235]:40335) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1qfbp4-0007yQ-33 for 65391@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 03:59:07 -0400 Received: by mail-lj1-x235.google.com with SMTP id 38308e7fff4ca-2bcb5423dc7so17931261fa.1 for <65391@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:59:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20221208; t=1694419136; x=1695023936; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=c89PVX1JzQ7AVZ7psII9DDyL9Se4xRsriODVKpagPB4=; b=Ax3mc+F+HYXY177IQpZASkGR8pYVBkTMzO/pDvnPui5UoQgfWBFmK+VLoopbkToMFq Xv6Abuu/B2uLQQfPo0axNYVO9hlyp+5cVpV2g3OOf/XoBwTNx6yEonV3ldiWINB9z5Cy gdBodonWrn11ghqRrKRjk37ul5kwQV9Twtja7TRy6Fr2Gw2obP8LUKsIFRX47hbUWIUn OUCVuwqsEbls1wvAZ6YXZcvL/oHmaByKks6uPYLClYWzw0Kf/KcohfujkJ31YACd0riZ EW/fzI1t/XMUZ/vR5YxljzezIiEZ1bDwhUd98Rj3bMy/sCUixsFfbTRv7I7SjRnQBoqC 6R5A== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1694419136; x=1695023936; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=c89PVX1JzQ7AVZ7psII9DDyL9Se4xRsriODVKpagPB4=; b=VbrP+ssEV31Cuygs5sFY1Ylne9EuSZZy04nJfchSPecOo/SBjqNALSNPxr+eTXuiYt gInp9HoOVC9WW4WynrwXkf6o4BibposojuewQNEAP3Xf1T+B2f8Ih0SU4mLUFmHC834d Lgpjkx9J1duDVOsDp7VTcLh8mg9CtumzPLZbkHMPLuHQ6hFbwGFTEnh/5wRIBWvlmKyL xnHeI6w86PI+cQedpb6ETCUCG+ItnThBkLuv1oxTR5jzXkEAV1s6nBSv+RZVJAVoML6c rV+HK1YbDd414BFuyGyaV6ANvZ9leOAi+xA9dO4HfJTs1aIPQteOKibgdH+njqSKdlgY uc9A== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0Yz+aDcL+18Y/N5VRcOBFG/Zt44gzyz19kkaBW8rGr/5Vg8n1yDH 3XiK1jEYiMeSokpMpkricv8wd7YCVAP7IRwK5Jw= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IEq6smbc9/k5g7R9bn9cA+SsAYH/wgkt2++Tqj4HCmbFJZN//j27zFxEdRRfnfUj/ERBpPlrmlYY4O8k58m6EY= X-Received: by 2002:a05:651c:2209:b0:2be:6262:36f1 with SMTP id y9-20020a05651c220900b002be626236f1mr7239412ljq.5.1694419135819; Mon, 11 Sep 2023 00:58:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <295ef8c8-574a-4169-98f3-6d9aaeb773f1@telenet.be> <6a62aced-9138-0496-fb01-d5d8e89ba8d6@telenet.be> <87h6ohc3gk.fsf@gmail.com> <87tts6kym3.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: From: Simon Tournier Date: Mon, 11 Sep 2023 09:58:44 +0200 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 2612C41938 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx1.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 7.28 X-Spam-Score: 7.28 X-TUID: BNxpFK3Lt26j Hi, On Mon, 11 Sept 2023 at 09:33, Csepp wrote: > That is not a package problem but a Guix interface problem. I have been > saying for a while that there needs to be an option to disable all > non-trivial local builds by default when you know your machine can't > handle them. IMHO, your proposal is orthogonal with the issue at hand: broken packages. Other said, the issue is: how to deal with the set of packages that will not build and we already know it (since weeks, months or even years for some). My workstation can handle all the compilations that are required. My laptop is able offload to it. The issue about broken packages is not about the resources. It is about burning resources for nothing. About the issue you are speaking about, we already had discussions in this direction -- you are not the only one saying "the fix needs to do X" for a while but please keep in mind that "talking does not cook the rice". ;-) Well, maybe you could open a ticket with a concrete use-case. Cheers, simon