From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55895) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j9AQm-0001Yg-5X for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:30:05 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9AQl-0008U5-9p for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:30:04 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:33926) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j9AQl-0008Tf-4E for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:30:03 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1j9AQk-00010h-W0 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 03 Mar 2020 11:30:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#39258] [PATCH 1/4] gnu: Add guile-xapian. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20200227204150.30985-1-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> <20200227204150.30985-2-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> In-Reply-To: <20200227204150.30985-2-arunisaac@systemreboot.net> From: zimoun Date: Tue, 3 Mar 2020 17:29:24 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Arun Isaac Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , 39258@debbugs.gnu.org Hi Arun, On Thu, 27 Feb 2020 at 21:42, Arun Isaac wrote: > * gnu/packages/guile-xyz.scm (guile-xapian, guile3.0-xapian): New variables. I am a bit lost with the Guile update. Now the convention should not be the opposite: guile-xapian using 3.0 and guile2.2-xapian using 2.2 (or simply 2.2 since 2.0 seems not really used). Otherwise, feel free to push it. :-) (It will ease to reach a large audience of testers for "guix search" ;-)) All the best, simon