From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id YAsJHXGlcV/LQwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:57:21 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2 with LMTPS id 0GbsGHGlcV++RgAAB5/wlQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:57:21 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E07E294023B for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:57:20 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:32776 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMoyF-0001VT-Ml for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:57:19 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42686) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMoy5-0001Tu-CL for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:57:09 -0400 Received: from mail-qt1-x82b.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b]:39733) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMoy3-0000An-Lf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 04:57:08 -0400 Received: by mail-qt1-x82b.google.com with SMTP id d1so166251qtr.6 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 01:57:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=EBfAP5U0gslkkqM73nuhpe+VSvi8q/8kijUjcVDRLu4=; b=L9pTxbFhSsT6VIbYSKLcFtdRh84zE6rnDyQb8AWbF9uXS6ePTodUoXqhUy7g2BSXFB /5bC719fggBPa2qF1amJe121VNQr3wXC00NKhrPRnHaE8L+kFCfa0bsPN3Y53OyqNdQJ E3h1MhLRWAH2/Vn3ztdpqW5/OZ7fO9XO8F7Y+uEFUynnmqGg2ch+URezJYP/wUg7g/zX Bp3wPGk6Ys0Miq4g5Q+y5++d+fxWSWF9Z211ddhPK2fHf8ndzMsCX9EUP8B1va/rph4P DpkAaLBYZapFRmdp32k3ST2bRcwPfOvTLx8jyMh8WWICYeew6SwbJ3VfggMAZ5xi0Fgw YE4Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=EBfAP5U0gslkkqM73nuhpe+VSvi8q/8kijUjcVDRLu4=; b=eS3sK9fd+X+SdsAaQ2muOxUp8UkF12+LvY7keIsyLml4tBCpzsTZl9A6V/VWI2E63M TnPnqanqzhv0Fso3KT3qJWmXRIRRLZdpVPjr9StSoDuV0TXQKFLn+JpfOG2tgNVWMZT9 HfA28gLmjxXysza0n/sDFdgkbqPFLxNxaaSJwB3IczWMsnL6cOXatJtZD5Dv+F+KDqk8 wSluS66/q8pzuJZPKXbS8Jwfl3Gb5iDqddzGJBYnogVd5PeH0s/WMbs3bn9Bg3uPLq2q f0TCkQH4XxmJ6ATYg6T0R8CO1ALptZADJv4AsMgwsDmnaf1X02BN4q2/IA6VEj2y6WZB FFsQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532hkULfgoKtL/b29I1fcbC8ofDdn45ypRI9gzP8i5I2TZia1EoM 2PqKGQxClnsvqU1mF+ZWYhlO25ZpFu7dzivnizE= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxGbWl+OyB9gV/Y55BTkAmABY0U6d1qvgMRMTqfQ3ABqg0Z0tYvluhXRLEA5bywexJf824dt3xzYVW+TeeyycY= X-Received: by 2002:ac8:2dc4:: with SMTP id q4mr476974qta.211.1601283426658; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 01:57:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <86wo0mnjs3.fsf@gmail.com> <87d02e3v61.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k0wjt774.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87h7rk8pmz.fsf@netris.org> <877dsgs8ch.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871rio8c0t.fsf@netris.org> <87imbz7mq2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878scvwkwd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> In-Reply-To: <878scvwkwd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: zimoun Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 10:56:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) To: Pierre Neidhardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::82b; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qt1-x82b.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=L9pTxbFh; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: LCl1pdLZjOyq Hi Pierre, On Sun, 27 Sep 2020 at 12:54, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > Just tested, EXWM works with emacs-no-x-toolkit! Cool! > So I suggest we add the following packages: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb > (package > (inherit emacs-xelb) > (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-xelb") [...] > (define-public emacs-no-x-toolkit-exwm > (package > (inherit emacs-exwm) > (name "emacs-no-x-toolkit-exwm") It appears to me more logical to name it: emacs-xelb-no-x-toolkit; appending the variation last. All the best, simon