From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id 8DpqOKlNqV4OHQAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:49:29 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id J3umDLJNqV6UZAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:49:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [IPv6:2001:470:142::17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 141F6940D1F for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 09:49:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:48018 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTjLV-00037P-06 for larch@yhetil.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:49:37 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35732) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTjLG-00031a-BE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:49:24 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTjLD-0003tl-4I for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:49:22 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]:46401) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jTjLC-0003tR-N6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 05:49:18 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id g74so1269718qke.13 for ; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 02:49:18 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=uledBaJL5Hm9xPSSQW/YOn7C5YVfiti58qxH4GRL9Ho=; b=A5zcXxet+fjXMIBzRQlPlGWO01Qcx5fkR21aSXTuf7ibx/5/a+QkRf1OieamnRFNMC 1pn31WCGgr3+L7FJGLSYToX680+CJdUjhZGc41Xvzb+FReKPKGw92vJ0SwW66fAYLq6r phi6OXKHalarVIQ7HSqk6QikMhQqSk4CNa75zGlKMssK5q+dE/xbp9NUr9LciMDOxwOg IUylzfXN3WpIWBnkMGsAf/pT0YyBXDmfWY0jUSvBWa4m2Rj1eA6PWOvU1tG2imfKsP89 vkioCz6TUQwG8DMQKFHW8jScSQVIxKkyCQfEuNNhKMj/xVy7OMp6MOt49XR8twnfA+Ii gEAA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=uledBaJL5Hm9xPSSQW/YOn7C5YVfiti58qxH4GRL9Ho=; b=GGHkNVjlPoGfVgTCIhtOPBmb+G9IROWmDC4Zu3aRj9h9OGqeoQKnkPt9L2nBcObjhA AhgYrJxi+IIbAkxT8JZnoRtRJCkPkYFjoqcTmtDx4E+ptK6dBDcNhVtdxvsdACB4WiHi T8qKLCygBw7DzKMvavh3umXqBpHQvlXyfGvKdTes8pLCyX6w3IhE5fqjCNj+tNanz1UL lWnZzCTgkx/czBwaJi0pKTBn9sVdxaGOPYrxlEdq3DOoDlcwSuhFQVSxCfYBGLx4HHN5 PPBhNUVpWM9s35HiL2xFztpp/gdUBfIw96jSEtfhTiDxFvx8xzar3b8Z1bfLZ36HIybO 3hwQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AGi0PubWUB8zyKmVkI0SGFyLEqReUB6ykAESPUKYHOsYBL0QGmqRTL5o lM9nBT+yYfWHsyni+yTKVtkwwSJQvyDXIMtoVOI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APiQypJ18P1WDXwk6k5ngCrvqqExUK2syXgnvW+8j1HSdeTqew6Dx/G2GkflNoGG8cr5XKyaQy/y4kl4VaXKk/6ltko= X-Received: by 2002:a37:a6d4:: with SMTP id p203mr29256748qke.201.1588153757411; Wed, 29 Apr 2020 02:49:17 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: In-Reply-To: From: zimoun Date: Wed, 29 Apr 2020 11:49:06 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: unexpected reproducibility of reproducible blog post? To: Konrad Hinsen Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::731; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x731.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: [-] PROGRAM ABORT : Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). Location : parse_addr6(), p0f-client.c:67 X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4864:20::731 X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 X-Spam-Score: -0.71 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=A5zcXxet; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 2001:470:142::17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Scan-Result: default: False [-0.71 / 13.00]; GENERIC_REPUTATION(0.00)[-0.49316106382279]; DWL_DNSWL_FAIL(0.00)[gmail.com:server fail,2001:470:142::17:server fail]; R_SPF_ALLOW(-0.20)[+ip6:2001:470:142::/48:c]; FREEMAIL_FROM(0.00)[gmail.com]; IP_REPUTATION_HAM(0.00)[asn: 22989(0.18), country: US(-0.00), ip: 2001:470:142::17(-0.49)]; TO_DN_ALL(0.00)[]; DKIM_TRACE(0.00)[gmail.com:+]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; DMARC_POLICY_ALLOW(-0.50)[gmail.com,none]; MX_GOOD(-0.50)[cached: eggs.gnu.org]; MAILLIST(-0.20)[mailman]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[fastmail.net]; FORGED_RECIPIENTS_MAILLIST(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:22989, ipnet:2001:470:142::/48, country:US]; SUBJECT_ENDS_QUESTION(1.00)[]; TAGGED_FROM(0.00)[larch=yhetil.org]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; R_DKIM_ALLOW(-0.20)[gmail.com:s=20161025]; RCVD_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[6]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; URIBL_BLOCKED(0.00)[fastmail.net:email]; FROM_NEQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[zimontoutoune@gmail.com,guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; PREVIOUSLY_DELIVERED(0.00)[guix-devel@gnu.org]; HAS_LIST_UNSUB(-0.01)[]; DNSWL_BLOCKED(0.00)[2001:470:142::17:from]; FORGED_SENDER_MAILLIST(0.00)[] X-TUID: mXUr4RJm6Ogg Hi Konrad, On Wed, 29 Apr 2020 at 11:26, Konrad Hinsen wrote: > > Has the file 'guix-version-for-reproduction.txt' been tracked? > > Unfortunately not. The repository for the preparation of the post > is at > > https://github.com/khinsen/reproducibility-with-guix/ > > but it doesn't contain the file 'guix-version-for-reproduction.txt'. Argh! The author should watch the Fun MOOC about computational reproducibility. ;-) > > Is really the commit 769b96b62e8c09b078f73adc09fb860505920f8f used to > > produce the Docker image listed in the blog post? > > Hard to say... I can't play with that right now because I am running > jobs on my computer that eat all the memory. Leo reproduced the new observed hash. > One question I have been wondering about is the possibility of grafts > being an obstacle to reproducibility. Grafts are something I don't > really understand yet, so I cannot answer this question. In particular, > does a grafted package get a different hash from a package built with > grafting disabled? Grafts or maybe Guile 2 -> 3? Cheers, simon