Re: Packaging Jami progress

[zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>]

Hi,

Thank you for working that.



On Mon, 25 Nov 2019 at 22:15, Jan <tona_kosmicznego_smiecia@interia.pl> wrote:

> Sorry for being impatient, but is it normal for patches to be merged
> that long? Is there something stopping the commits?
> I need those merged in order to continue working on Jami.

Two weeks are not that long. ;-)
If you feel frustrating -- and I understand, I feel time to time the
same :-) -- my advice is to help to decrease the stack by reviewing
(building, testing, asking the status) of old patches [1] and/or by
trying to close old bugs [2].

[1] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?repeatmerged=0;max-bugs=100;base-order=1;package=guix-patches;bug-rev=1;ordering=normal;archive=0;page=4
[2] https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/pkgreport.cgi?package=guix;max-bugs=100;archive=0;ordering=normal;base-order=1;repeatmerged=0;bug-rev=1;page=9


Why do you need these merged in master to continue working on Jami?


In any case, the patch "[PATCH 2/9] gnu: Add sobjectizer." does not
seem to apply because the commit 7e08be71ac39f (pushed the day after
Pierre submitted the series :-))


Pierre, could you advice me with your Magit' power to easily apply and
test the series? Or the only way is to rebase against the parent
commit of the Mathieu's commit?


Cheers,
simon