From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id sCqEFOoDc19tbAAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:52:42 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id uFtjEOoDc19LfgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:52:42 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CED619401BD for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 09:52:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:43824 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNCJM-0007Hw-HX for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:52:40 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:37958) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNCIP-0006rH-O9 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:51:41 -0400 Received: from mail-qv1-xf32.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32]:42781) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kNCIO-0008MH-2c for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 05:51:41 -0400 Received: by mail-qv1-xf32.google.com with SMTP id h1so1946110qvo.9 for ; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 02:51:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=OkTH7xQdddB38bsUPHczwxcum+FO8w7oCfVOhW4XTZs=; b=Os7gDf4QozQsR9s98fAFezAPRA4UK8enT0E2Iy78bPW+/y5DWnYiDm/ojO+1Yj4bSK OMGspgu2BKxghAqPzKo476oTp0ptVoDcx0fXDSVyo+UemU5EsCumHTrYXDNFPEt6zmM+ w5DPEMyQ/L8I3l3mFyGTob45BegdwMzHtL/QZgNaJdIIA7L6Ad/Q61a+Onszz9K/Cm0c iET31TuRCx/Z+9JOpGXeCoiU1Pzl1H++wJMVl7s010hXw1C3iwjqEwVDX89Xt7uIP1d8 4VvL7yzGjtjwo1UWOd6p3PucP99TO7knRYYYIdA/7K7M5zrcNG0VNWoe9YQxt3DqDv0V CBWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=OkTH7xQdddB38bsUPHczwxcum+FO8w7oCfVOhW4XTZs=; b=hjGh2OAkPKFm9pHyEOsoMLK86gYEK0Twn4ePozX72/BGF8sQpEkeKyaU7tNjaCXheh zJ1F8H0//vVwYXqhlt7qyLYaFca00oBn+GrUXoPCkwYMA9794CdpGAB9ow5IReRtKGg5 P6PP5abVS+oS+xVHULVeygcAixLeyZZjsPqpx6Jt1/szxCPDYlGy+txgjySF/QQRL6qc r7KkaSY3Nh/FHwdrbnKdDfZpRKKbq+81gyVV/gEwQuxAIX/nAS0WFCa5C0XEgENaxAIt FzhzcY2Y41rITXELDKlwMEA23LA3dQEVVloVQ7/pY0NWtLyhhCykn+CgQ6kSV1v0lDP4 92OA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530OLjvTVdaNchKsutOu+TT2xBwAr0jCi6JhXp61JkuDOloLLRMA TCE5doXJ1dF6ACmecVYLMspevscniQLYSd4O5beR6J6e X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0Ee2V56GZA1r048ZMysbz5wVEKhuErc3E/3ZSsF0gMxBrjtWsGjasyMStzk+VTJlp5APyMPbOW5Q0Jo8Gtd8= X-Received: by 2002:ad4:58e7:: with SMTP id di7mr3707938qvb.36.1601373098310; Tue, 29 Sep 2020 02:51:38 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <86wo0mnjs3.fsf@gmail.com> <87d02e3v61.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k0wjt774.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87blhutg3n.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <86blhttq1a.fsf@gmail.com> <87blhp55zb.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> In-Reply-To: <87blhp55zb.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> From: zimoun Date: Tue, 29 Sep 2020 11:51:27 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) To: Giovanni Biscuolo Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::f32; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qv1-xf32.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=Os7gDf4Q; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: -1.71 X-TUID: u9H+bHYqAJOj On Tue, 29 Sep 2020 at 10:42, Giovanni Biscuolo wrote: > Please consider I'm still on Emacs 26.3 since one package I use does not > work with 27.1... and I still have not tested "the bug" in a pure > anvironmentt with emacs 27.1 only Ouch! Which one is it? > I'm affected by that bug every time I do: > > 1. on machine A: start emacs --daemon > 2. on machine B: ssh -Y me@A > 3. on machine B: emacsclient -c (in ssh session) Sorry, I miss where this emacsclient is started? A or B? If you start emacsclient on B and try to connect over SSH to the server on A, which option do you provide? (naive question because I have always failed to do that :-)) Personally, I have 2 uses cases: i. machine A: emacs --daemon machine B: ssh -C me@A -t emacsclient -t and I never do "ssh -CX me@A -t emacsclient -c" because the network is usually too slow to export DISPLAY; machines A and B are usually a bit far in my cases. ii. machine B: start emacs --daemon machine B: emacsclient -c machine B: open via TRAMP over ssh on A And Tramp crashes time to time. > AFAIU this bug is still affecting other Emacs users using GTK as X > toolkit. Yeah, for sure. And as you noted too, it is difficult to know what is the exact status of this bug. :-) All the best, simon