From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: zimoun Subject: Re: Document GUIX_LOAD_PATH? Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 18:09:35 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87pnglj2ka.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87sglgsiey.fsf@lassieur.org> <878sn8inru.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o8w4mewg.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv5wfdrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:48047) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ihzJ8-0005GC-Cg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:09:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ihzJ7-0005UQ-6j for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:09:50 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tv5wfdrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: Guix Devel , =?UTF-8?Q?Cl=C3=A9ment_Lassieur?= On Thu, 19 Dec 2019 at 18:04, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > So the question is: shall we add --load-path to all commands instead? > (If not already the case.) Only commands that need it. :-) Do you have in mind commands where the option --load-path is still missing? Maybe "guix graph"? Maybe "guix edit"?