From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:44469) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1isULu-00035f-Tg for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:20:11 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1isULq-0008LB-Lp for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:20:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:34018) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1isULq-0008L1-IM for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:20:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1isULq-0002CO-D2 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 11:20:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#38678] Command line option in addition to GUIX_PACKAGE_PATH - Reason? Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87pnglj2ka.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87sglgsiey.fsf@lassieur.org> <878sn8inru.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87o8w4mewg.fsf@gnu.org> <87tv5wfdrm.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87lfr8fd9u.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <20191226213108.753f8ab7@scratchpost.org> <87blr3eao0.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87ftge13h5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> In-Reply-To: <87ftge13h5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: zimoun Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2020 17:19:12 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Pierre Neidhardt Cc: 38678@debbugs.gnu.org On Fri, 17 Jan 2020 at 16:56, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > I have already merged, can you rebase your changes against master? :) By "merged", you mean pushed. ;-) It is not a rebase, but another commit, right? What will be the commit message? --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- refresh: Fix internal variable name. * guix/scripts/refresh.scm (%option): Fix internal variable name. --8<---------------cut here---------------stop-------------->8--- It is ok?