From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id uOiyMxfRcV85SwAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:03:35 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id oPO0LxfRcV9kQAAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:03:35 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6B9839402B7 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 12:03:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:34768 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMrsU-0007fb-AV for larch@yhetil.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:03:34 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:42326) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMrsD-0007fJ-Ev for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:03:17 -0400 Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]:35721) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1kMrs7-0001YW-7p for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 08:03:17 -0400 Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id q5so652352qkc.2 for ; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:03:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=Ld55Ft21FZjl5z93wQBN1/s62nBURxGutptSfng9IuA=; b=WO5KxoXG1nYx4UCfIEBB6hdyuBv9d9ydv3UsGWEnSQYa+Yqupd+cPtCm/KiT+5H4J4 tXHPxc0tE2Sx1mEyfpsIH0+YsDMV4RBOvbh0mGXyIYFG81nOcRPlo8AvDtrQnSkgR5g5 EwB7V2UV8mVGRTdrtZsLcVOo34ZCfjmNTzbKrluyv3OvW57ZRIM3z4PV/hgu36i8U/U6 x93UdAiVRuKt/topImM4MYtWB0kEwJQImmzo4m5CoI6uq2deXFKuJzGLw8bgvBVUF5Hn 0xpEN4szQcE+UZm8YpnyfrERq/05Gpvx4f9AONxA928pox+EeZtVbYPOlfiZS7nYE1Ae +M6Q== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Ld55Ft21FZjl5z93wQBN1/s62nBURxGutptSfng9IuA=; b=XRjf6L0fFWMMNqVjtmjzTU0CgXCV7KLNISOOL9+is1vR8WEcZvBryYXA8AFaMfw6/r wIGgddAjqrJwfqEfpXodfE//xJUxaRD3cLawB3cfr9c+34y7WmaEqMlY4iXL2BB6yf4j FyFS21/Or5+21c7xKLZKjQhvOVw0UvftjsG9LcBNThHbP1nw/OUmTi+S1/Ed1iSw64aD F6iYZj3jHSt1VOW7AJhlYCLLjrRuZ+cYAgAXGyeRdYsYnMNY2UDTJHoGH6R2UpJM9Inq OxDd7ulrxdWCfVeBKZNAlUw/5rfhg+zeA78CkG7ZNBVYlsTrXKxnTn4b+//51tNEGjUg tz7w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530IZAKHgDS01P65kX8ndL5JZOrkl8Q27Ikqwgme2mXGSDwvZiQq jh3YiEma7xbZuzaCNyp2d9rha7fTltD21okb+57uI2hTMhLcVg== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxJQ+YVlMcg1Pme/GoxVm4muvS+PGiOd4YFEtpIhqHqIsbVMKTB1lfla4jJ45Abo0xSOaXIYfs06xOZrXVqOzQ= X-Received: by 2002:a37:9b4d:: with SMTP id d74mr922825qke.201.1601294586664; Mon, 28 Sep 2020 05:03:06 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <86wo0mnjs3.fsf@gmail.com> <87d02e3v61.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <87k0wjt774.fsf@roquette.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> <87h7rk8pmz.fsf@netris.org> <877dsgs8ch.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <871rio8c0t.fsf@netris.org> <87imbz7mq2.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <878scvwkwd.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> <873632uub5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> In-Reply-To: <873632uub5.fsf@ambrevar.xyz> From: zimoun Date: Mon, 28 Sep 2020 14:02:55 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: emacs-lucid (was Re: Emacs closure at ~900MB?) To: Pierre Neidhardt Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::731; envelope-from=zimon.toutoune@gmail.com; helo=mail-qk1-x731.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Scanner: scn0 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail (rsa verify failed) header.d=gmail.com header.s=20161025 header.b=WO5KxoXG; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Spam-Score: 0.09 X-TUID: Ihgen6/sxdue On Mon, 28 Sep 2020 at 11:25, Pierre Neidhardt wrote: > > zimoun writes: > > > It appears to me more logical to name it: emacs-xelb-no-x-toolkit; > > appending the variation last. > > Depends how you look at it ;) But I don't have a strong opinion. Me neither. Just it seems more consistent: 1. with how "guix search" works (see 'relevance') and 2. with the description which says "`emacs-xelb' is a pure Emacs Lisp [...]". Cheers, simon