From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:55604)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j53rt-0007zU-2E
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:41:05 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j53rr-0007Nj-Q7
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:41:04 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:40368)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1j53rr-0007M0-LF
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:41:03 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1j53rq-0003Yw-Iq
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Fri, 21 Feb 2020 03:41:02 -0500
Subject: [bug#39588] gnu: Add mpich, scalapack-mpich, mumps-mpich,
 pt-scotch-mpich, python-mpi4py-mpich
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.39588.B39588.158227442013636@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <87blq2rclk.fsf@inria.fr> <87o8tx3z2q.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ0szPexSebyY4Td+M9Lb06WGHD__Qh+A3qOvL-Ei2efnw@mail.gmail.com>
 <87eeupd3t1.fsf@gnu.org>
 <CAJ3okZ1DnP9ZZE2Ovxj_87Akazxw+743ahwTNDN24aBThGB+jg@mail.gmail.com>
 <87pne8pdsl.fsf@gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <87pne8pdsl.fsf@gnu.org>
From: zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 09:40:00 +0100
Message-ID: <CAJ3okZ04OpBVtUm07=B-J+zvn4cU09E4VVqATBUKnfizKqGKcQ@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= <ludo@gnu.org>
Cc: Maurice =?UTF-8?Q?Br=C3=A9mond?= <Maurice.Bremond@inria.fr>, 39588@debbugs.gnu.org

On Fri, 21 Feb 2020 at 09:03, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote:
> zimoun <zimon.toutoune@gmail.com> skribis:
> > On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 at 10:08, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> wrote=
:
> >
> >> > Other said, '--with-inputs' will do the job for explicit packages bu=
t
> >> > not the implicit ones.
> >>
> >> Right, =E2=80=98--with-input=E2=80=99 could be =E2=80=9Cgood enough=E2=
=80=9D.
> >
> > About openmpi->mpich, I am not sure it will work because of:
> >
> > #:phases (modify-phases %standard-phases
> >                   (add-before 'check 'mpi-setup
> >             ,%openmpi-setup))
>
> That phase just sets environment variables that MPICH will happily
> ignore.

Yes "qui peut le plus peut le moins". ;-)
But if the package mpich requires environment variables too.

(I do not have a clean MPI installation at hand so it is difficult to
really test.)


Cheers,
simon