On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 9:46 PM, carl hansen <carlhansen1234@gmail.com>
wrote:

>
>
> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 7:44 PM, Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name> wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 05:24:36PM -0800, carl hansen wrote:
>> > resent
>> > ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>> > From: carl hansen <carlhansen1234@gmail.com>
>> > Date: Thu, Jan 28, 2016 at 5:21 PM
>> > Subject: warning: collision encountered
>> > To: guix-help@gnu.org
>> >
>> >
>> > I get
>> > warning: collision encountered: ...
>> > warning: arbitrarily choosing /gnu/store/89
>> > messages,
>> > What do they mean? and How to fix?
>>
>> Does this explanation make sense?
>> http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=22402#37
>>
>> If so, then you should read the warnings and investigate which files are
>> colliding. Some, like the hicolor icon-theme.cache, seem harmless to me,
>> although I welcome a second opinion.
>>
>> [...]
>>
>> > 13985 warning: collision encountered:
>> > /gnu/store/wfvxxpdhnzd59vkad1zasm4f858giv9a-gcj-4.9.3/lib/libatomic.la
>> > /gnu/store      /rsgg9a3kwivqszsydvan8pbpdq9ivar5-gccgo-4.8.5/lib/
>> > libatomic.la /gnu/store/0bz73dnv3yyiff0fgph9c8lvjz919cl1-gcc-bo
>> > otstrap-0/lib/libatomic.la
>> > 13986 warning: arbitrarily choosing
>> > /gnu/store/wfvxxpdhnzd59vkad1zasm4f858giv9a-gcj-4.9.3/lib/libatomic.la
>> > 13987 2354 packages in profile
>>
>> I don't know about this one. Files the .la extension are used by libtool
>> but I don't have enough experience with libtool or know enough about
>> libatomic to know if this is going to be a problem.
>>
>
> Yes this is a continuation of my previous question. Thanks for response. I
> didn't
> show the complete output. But I tried to show there are 13987 LINES in the
> error
> messages. It's not so much the particular cases, it's Why is this
> happening at all?
> Did I do smething wrong or is this software error? ANd, what is the proper
> procedure to
> removal of one of the options?
> Is it something like:   <http://libatomic.la>
> guix package -r /gnu/store/wfvxxpdhnzd59vkad1zasm4f858giv9a-gcj-4.9.3/lib/
> libatomic.la
> or is it
> guix package -r /gnu/store/wfvxxpdhnzd59vkad1zasm4f858giv9a-gcj-4.9.3
> or is it
> guix package -r / gcj
> And can it be done globally?
> THere must be something I'm not doing correctly.
>
> followup
I do:
# ls -1 /gnu/store  |sort -k 1.34 >/tmp/a
in /tmp/a I see many , what look like duplicates, module the base32 string
in the front,
for example
   38 63zwd686rpjifkv37abmd723asjzskva-acl-2.2.52/
   39 csrip06lky3f2abgyvzc2bki9pgnz4ib-acl-2.2.52/
   40 rjcxalra8f54qk7h32zw8irx4fi9x649-acl-2.2.52/
   41 y1kvygp3yaj1p0ar134rxl8y6dn3vc93-acl-2.2.52/
   42 72ax524fif2yii3bqwa3rjnh450cj3vc-acl-2.2.52.drv
   43 bzhcnfwikxh9rm52cq8cphzk77k9sfxv-acl-2.2.52.drv
   44 fihsyanl3a8bwpxlyx25dgi0z1zmqcp4-acl-2.2.52.drv
   45 kvrwv1bndn4935k21qimvanqc9dwlljj-acl-2.2.52.drv
   46 sy6b7h80z1vm9dc0xixbli9n9500q5c6-acl-2.2.52.drv
   47 x03zv2wxk9xvw27pg5vvy6lbfavy3nix-acl-2.2.52.drv
   48 y8ql9x2sck3jr26jf5l9ky9lz7ci0aaq-acl-2.2.52.drv
   49 1jwh0x0mvvjmq9gjn9lxnw6szvpb5bwi-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder
   50 daridrmp97fnim0pddp51lhqn1c1nwv0-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder
   51 hbi7spdvfs177c3jzv3zn85j5wgp7hrv-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder
   52 lj4bmca87irvdsvrngsgah96yby3rzpx-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder
   53 w51ji955hc155h5lcmvcmpq33fr407vq-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder
   54 xzzl47vl72630q2idvcy24jm4ln47xkh-acl-2.2.52-guile-builder
   55 2x3b0w1cx9128p564s5iryp76yy4l8w0-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz
   56 40652r2q5pp3dsagmgvrsdxqvwhlsgh0-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv
   57 44j13yy6i77ds4h892hpjwqw37lilzpd-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv
   58 gp8n2wncrh28z6ci2d19ygajsjr6r8j2-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv
   59 l9r8zfdrr3zj9sab718rvka1526iqqam-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv
   60 ls6l9hw5mni4gnvv3ah3rw0w8vsb9bcm-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv
   61 pdfkasamwqgfb3a3q4fl76n3063bg4xl-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv
   62 rpsy437kb159jah8jc28maqdlc0bl6dg-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.gz.drv
    63 wy8x3rv7813y0m066j8hgdjnglhhgndz-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz
   64 2ni0661zabg5smck6waw7klhgn2ap148-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder
   65 afpdjihigsq17jmfbpl1bp0dmjmzxxs3-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder
   66 g138q6khixv4bncbarq5iqkmwgmz2kzm-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder
   67 qw0d8nijs4a6ws3lnsp05jj8r0l8jj7x-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder
   68 s87d78mkxcifsmzyazrjsgk08madmxmg-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder
   69 ygb39n10b8igrna3cpb3jq4c6pfvgxr4-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz-builder
   70 9xpib4851r6fzcbpqkx2kzkpss41n396-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv
   71 fzfz725bc0w09ywkzy2pmgds3gddq2qh-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv
   72 ldqb22pvg98qviicnv6j1ngl5d0xp990-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv
   73 myw3bnfnr8yincq0fpqjaa3pqmn765bx-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv
   74 qnq01qbjdjvxp72iw9hjv1wch5i06rni-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv
   75 x79i0cjjzn2pjrnfs1v12cal4habdbdx-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv
   76 xz4pv2gwg56xnb97bv8scwcqi36l3by2-acl-2.2.52.src.tar.xz.drv
   77 x90p71bkxmlr66fwhrp2vzlhc2p4adjl-acl-hurd-path-max.patch

Shirlie, that can't be right?
BTW
ls -1 /gnu/store|wc
 14580   14580  849158
does that seem reasonable?