Thank you for taking the time to look into my patch. Sorry, I'm new to Guix
and to this workflow. So, forgive me if my questions look a bit naive:
1. What do you mean by reroll count for the patch?
2. I looked at the copy-build-system documentation. I'm not sure how it can
be used here. I'm not just updating the shebang. As you can already see in
the patch, I'm doing a lot of string substitutions in the source code
itself because some values are hard coded. That's why I preferred to use
the trivial-build-system to have more control of what I need to substitute.

Thanks,
Omar

On Wed, 18 Sept 2024 at 16:19, Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com>
wrote:

> Hi Omar,
>
> Thank you for submitting this patch.  A few comments:
>
> Omar Bassam <omar.bassam88@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > Change-Id: I730ef2f5c874c5142a580a42af76180e95d93ccd
> > ---
> >  gnu/packages/lisp.scm | 52 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 52 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/lisp.scm b/gnu/packages/lisp.scm
> > index 5d4399f145..96698d375d 100644
>
> Could you please update the reroll-count when you send amendments to the
> patch?  IIUC, this version should have been v2.
>
> > +(define-public jpm
> > +  (package
> > +    (name "jpm")
> > +    (version "1.1.0")
> > +    (source (origin
> > +              (method git-fetch)
> > +              (uri (git-reference
> > +                    (url "https://github.com/janet-lang/jpm.git")
> > +                    (commit (string-append "v" version))))
> > +              (file-name (git-file-name name version))
> > +              (sha256 (base32
> "05rdxigmiy7vf93s16a8n2029lq33073jccz1rjl4iisxj6piw4l"))))
> > +    (build-system trivial-build-system)
> > ...
> > +                    (substitute* (string-append %output "/bin/jpm")
> > +                      (("/usr/bin/env janet")
> > +                       (string-append #$janet "/bin/janet")))
>
> Is my understanding correct that you're updating the shebang line here?
> If so, would it be better to use the copy-build-system instead?  If not,
> could you please elaborate?  If copy-build-system does indeed turn out
> to be better suited, could you please send v3 of the patch?
>
> --
> Suhail
>