From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Manolis Ragkousis Subject: Re: GSoC: Porting Guix to Hurd week 3+4 report. Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2015 16:12:03 +0300 Message-ID: References: <87wpzo1oqk.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhg2je9j.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <87h9qnqjwv.fsf@gnu.org> <873823i6gl.fsf@kepler.schwinge.homeip.net> <87lhfuuzii.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1wqX-00017d-F8 for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 09:12:10 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Z1wqS-0005Eu-Us for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Jun 2015 09:12:09 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87lhfuuzii.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: Guix-devel , bug-hurd@gnu.org, Thomas Schwinge , Samuel Thibault Hello > Now, from a discussion we had on IRC, I think the problem reported at > the beginning of this thread is fixed. Manolis, can you confirm? Yes, I am doing a local cleanup and I am sending the patches to the list. > Also, I think the target should be 4.9 or 4.8, but definitely not 4.7. > See also > . Yes it was a mistake from my part. Manolis