From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Wilson Bustos Subject: Re: Joint statement on the GNU Project Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:37:10 -0300 Message-ID: References: <87ftk4hbhu.fsf@gnu.org> <20191008081928.mcg7oxb3q5jp6nhr@pelzflorian.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000035fae20594671b50" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:51384) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iHqc9-0000gQ-FC for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:37:26 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iHqc7-0005sd-W3 for Guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 10:37:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20191008081928.mcg7oxb3q5jp6nhr@pelzflorian.localdomain> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Cc: Guix-devel , Jesse Gibbons , GNU Guix maintainers --00000000000035fae20594671b50 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable pelzflorian, I read the original source, and that girl in medium take out of context everything. Is curious see also how every person who defends Stallman with arguments was banned in reddit. https://www.reddit.com/r/StallmanWasRight/comments/d7cpun/meta_to_the_mods_= please_tell_us_why_you_removed/f0z8hr6/?utm_source=3Dreddit&utm_medium=3Dus= ertext&utm_name=3DStallmanWasRight&utm_content=3Dt1_f18jmjs By other side, Stallman replied a internal email in MIT, was not talking in the name of the FSF or GNU, what is the problem? should we take all that he think and say in his personal life and pretend it is as a public speech? The free software communities has to work with every person with every idea always in the community we work with respect with each other. I think IMHO, that everyone do to Stallman was malicious and is an attack to the free thinking and speech. IMHO, We want deeply diversity, that means thinking diversity not only 'gender diversity' which is a surface diversity. More info: https://sterling-archermedes.github.io/ This is an analysis of the press version VS reallity I hope not be pushed out also to express my opinion. Regads! El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las 5:19, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) (< pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>) escribi=C3=B3: > On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 10:59:41PM -0300, Wilson Bustos wrote: > > Which 'behavior' are you exactly talking about? > > Perhaps > > https://medium.com/@selamjie/remove-richard-stallman-appendix-a-a7e41e784= f88 > > Thank you, GNU maintainers, for your statement. > > Regards, > Florian > --00000000000035fae20594671b50 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
pelzflor= ian,
I read the original source, and that girl in medium take out = of context everything.
Is curious see also how every person who de= fends Stallman with arguments was banned in reddit.
https://www= .reddit.com/r/StallmanWasRight/comments/d7cpun/meta_to_the_mods_please_tell= _us_why_you_removed/f0z8hr6/?utm_source=3Dreddit&utm_medium=3Dusertext&= amp;utm_name=3DStallmanWasRight&utm_content=3Dt1_f18jmjs

By other side, Stallman replied a internal email in MIT, was not talking= in the name of the FSF or GNU, what is the problem?
should we tak= e all that he think and say in his personal life and pretend it is as a pub= lic speech?

The free software communities has to work with eve= ry person with every idea always in the community we work with respect with= each other.
I think IMHO, that everyone do to Stallman was malici= ous and is an attack to the free thinking and speech.

IMHO, We= want deeply diversity, that means thinking diversity not only 'gender = diversity' which is a surface diversity.

More info:
https://sterling-archermed= es.github.io/ This is an analysis of the press version VS reallity
<= br>
I hope not be pushed out also to express my opinion.

= Regads!


El mar., 8 oct. 2019 a las = 5:19, pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) (<pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de>) escribi=C3=B3:
On Mon, Oct 07, 2019 at 10:59:4= 1PM -0300, Wilson Bustos wrote:
> Which 'behavior' are you exactly talking about?

Perhaps
https://medium.com/@sela= mjie/remove-richard-stallman-appendix-a-a7e41e784f88

Thank you, GNU maintainers, for your statement.

Regards,
Florian
--00000000000035fae20594671b50--