From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: native or not Date: Wed, 1 Apr 2020 00:01:20 +0200 Message-ID: References: <87a73ypbyb.fsf@gmail.com> <87h7y4kgdq.fsf@nckx> <87d08svep1.fsf@devup.no> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52472) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jJOww-00055H-Li for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:01:35 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJOwv-0003T3-BT for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:01:34 -0400 Received: from mail-il1-x144.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::144]:37388) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jJOwv-0003QQ-4P for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 18:01:33 -0400 Received: by mail-il1-x144.google.com with SMTP id a6so21049703ilr.4 for ; Tue, 31 Mar 2020 15:01:33 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <87d08svep1.fsf@devup.no> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Marius Bakke , mail@cbaines.net Cc: guix-devel Hello, On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 3:25 PM Marius Bakke wrote: > Unless you are cross-compiling (i.e. guix build --target=foo), > native-inputs and inputs behave exactly the same; they are simply > concatenated. OK, thanks for the clarification. Christopher, I'm not a web guy, I may take a shot at it, when my todo list gets emptyish, but don't hold your breath, that may not happen in this life... Following this will come the next batch of native-inputs. Built on x86_64, tried to also target aarch64, but kind of unconclusive (one stopped at perl, another at mit-krb5...) I've searched core-updates to avoid duplicating work, but only after having done it... Got lucky to have only lost a few minutes on openldap... The graphviz patch may not be for master as it may force 2918 packages to be rebuilt. The other ones should be OK. Question: should I stay on guix-devel, should I add guix-patches or should I move to guix-patches for the following patche series ? -- Vincent Legoll