From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Vincent Legoll Subject: Re: Separate Mailing Lists for Patches vs General Dev Discussion? Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2016 14:47:28 +0200 Message-ID: References: <5796782D.1010104@gmx.net> <8760rsa88t.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS1lk-0005wm-JC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:47:33 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1bS1lj-0001fJ-Pf for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 26 Jul 2016 08:47:32 -0400 In-Reply-To: <8760rsa88t.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?UTF-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel I'm not sure a separate additional ML would enhance the situation, the combined volume is low enough to let them stay together. But resurrection & real use of patchwork (or any other consensus web tracker) would be a plus for at least some of us newcomers from different horizons. I can understand the repulsion against some of them, but a PR-like enabled one could ease the on-boarding of new contributors. So if it's acceptable to committers, why not try to use one a bit more regularly ? -- Vincent Legoll