From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: /dev/urandom
Date: Wed, 11 Jul 2018 17:07:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEwRq=q1GyqufoF+RfJCzFCF9jyRHHL8yUMG=_i58aFuhWhHrw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <20180710182211.75442f8b@scratchpost.org>
	<87601nylro.fsf@netris.org>
	<20180711161748.56d770ea@scratchpost.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51966)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1fdGhs-0002KP-Qm
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:07:05 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1fdGhs-0007m5-2s
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:07:04 -0400
Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]:41006)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>)
	id 1fdGhr-0007lk-Ta
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 11:07:03 -0400
Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id q9-v6so23897019ioj.8
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Wed, 11 Jul 2018 08:07:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20180711161748.56d770ea@scratchpost.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Danny Milosavljevic <dannym@scratchpost.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On Wed, Jul 11, 2018 at 4:17 PM, Danny Milosavljevic
<dannym@scratchpost.org> wrote:
> the randomness is necessary for NAND wear levelling,

Any pointers about that subject ?

This looks strange as I'd have thought that less writes => less wear.

-- 
Vincent Legoll