From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52638)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jHbr4-0001jM-Jb
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:24:07 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jHbr0-0007u4-EX
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:24:06 -0400
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:54394)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
 id 1jHbr0-0007tk-8H
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:24:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
 (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1jHbr0-00056I-3T
 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Thu, 26 Mar 2020 19:24:02 -0400
Subject: [bug#40246] gnu: Add cramfs-tools
References: <CAEwRq=r09qqcCfgC=CpMJZ4g3JztS8SkDieSHMPpMjpOH39QyA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAEwRq=r09qqcCfgC=CpMJZ4g3JztS8SkDieSHMPpMjpOH39QyA@mail.gmail.com>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.40246.B40246.158526499619547@debbugs.gnu.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Mar 2020 00:22:57 +0100
Message-ID: <CAEwRq=q-gURk8L5fBTtG0iOU2nA9fKxAmYYND1-hkp6JCL8-sw@mail.gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
List-Id: <guix-patches.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-patches>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-patches@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-patches>,
 <mailto:guix-patches-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-patches" <guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org>
To: 40246@debbugs.gnu.org

This was obsoleted, but then resurrected later...

>From wikikpedia
[...]
In 2013, Linux maintainers indicated that cramfs was made obsolete by
squashfs,[1] but the file system got rehabilitated in 2017 for use in
low-memory devices where using squashfs may not be viable.
[...]

And also the guix kernel has support for it...
So why not ?

-- 
Vincent Legoll