From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PACKAGE] musl libc
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2016 20:43:02 +0200
Message-ID: <CAEwRq=pY5BwUXEj6XQitpsQ4cYCv9jOCdOYF_6yevUG7Y_OtzQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAL1_imn03yPUiu5qg=9wdDXS2csiHrSxprNGnOHsdsJuqFnv9w@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35040)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1bWpVx-0000aQ-Ki
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 14:43:06 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1bWpVv-0000X8-I6
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 14:43:04 -0400
Received: from mail-qk0-x229.google.com ([2607:f8b0:400d:c09::229]:36117)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <vincent.legoll@gmail.com>) id 1bWpVv-0000Ww-De
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 14:43:03 -0400
Received: by mail-qk0-x229.google.com with SMTP id v123so198388695qkh.3
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Mon, 08 Aug 2016 11:43:03 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAL1_imn03yPUiu5qg=9wdDXS2csiHrSxprNGnOHsdsJuqFnv9w@mail.gmail.com>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: David Craven <david@craven.ch>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

> Vincent, can you run file and readelf -d on the sinit binary you
> compiled using the gcc-musl wrapper? That will tell us if it worked.
>
> The output of readelf -d should look like this:
>
> 0x0000000000000001 (NEEDED)             Shared library: [libc.so]
> 0x000000000000001d (RUNPATH)           Library runpath:
> [/nix/store/16c974l1kqra3cr475gcgy2gsii45liq-musl-1.1.14/lib]
>
> and the output of file should look like this:
>
> ELF 64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), dynamically
> linked, interpreter
> /nix/store/16c974l1kqra3cr475gcgy2gsii45liq-musl-1.1.14/lib/libc.so,
> not stripped

The default sinit build process uses -static, so I get:

$ l /gnu/store/zfbhkbcfjpmnarsid9wl0q4ssswps96p-sinit-1.0/bin/sinit
-r-xr-xr-x 2 root root 9.3K Jan  1  1970
/gnu/store/zfbhkbcfjpmnarsid9wl0q4ssswps96p-sinit-1.0/bin/sinit

$ file /gnu/store/zfbhkbcfjpmnarsid9wl0q4ssswps96p-sinit-1.0/bin/sinit
/gnu/store/zfbhkbcfjpmnarsid9wl0q4ssswps96p-sinit-1.0/bin/sinit: ELF
64-bit LSB executable, x86-64, version 1 (SYSV), statically linked,
stripped

$ readelf -d /gnu/store/zfbhkbcfjpmnarsid9wl0q4ssswps96p-sinit-1.0/bin/sinit
There is no dynamic section in this file.

And I think that shows it worked, just the static way...

Do you prefer dynamically linked ?

-- 
Vincent Legoll