From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id CCyaGPK7eWbwuQAAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:33:22 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id CCyaGPK7eWbwuQAAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:33:22 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=FQCKPgTC; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1719254002; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=dc+4Gux+PFbRKBisWjJjiMHggw5GegP/kjBDGy2ctIY=; b=lttrYAvt2d3miEMHMk6ISvNKQVfyE75tslKusFRc/QJGAr2o6aW2Gj22VVD66sv5RpxDcG Tbg7jWdUVBWsHHhpjscxru+NqghmgzfSlGXd/iChS+hZxDBV2TOQvKPrM6+Z7TJtuovhht HFiEh+R70AbxBjpd4s/eM9BTN4BCNirVJKFTTWJAeDPGF7+lPE2mTe7sYwBarRYLw/prbk pOgM/PW55/9k+emVfeSdWUU3wAzdNAJ23h1nIpWNId4YJozDqMoblNM3OXssstkqk4cyjT pn90yMAJMRr5JT2PjANajmB2Xqe9VsHDIcbicbgNZDgUCw6SgXsvjv8Am6vqxA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1719254002; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=YFkZVQ1gaiHImi9Xq9m1vHEBkZETAA6+zw0ABS06kTGDDJlPsbBDpZdFDmgOBz0efMUvi/ Sx+7BlVqa+anhpb8PttZ1bswBEE8i3FbA+L8itNRwe7H+UM+mUZcA2Fh5QLNk4WimqMLA0 2mGqjzZVHlmHpyKOl9qw0GuxuCetolUgLsducri2+S9ZXnvFeBQM8J6/4C4gZgB1vLuPjP 0S0FfwJpK76fwLspqe7od6Z5kdqtgTs/mjH8cP6X+VlitVQwFbRgRmm+gXzUjXLBgrH7NC M9D2vy2EW50RPy6ykdgcKNHh1bh1nUacvsr8ky2OY4athSwvvGbJ2PNoIIE2kg== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=FQCKPgTC; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E785011D08 for ; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 20:33:21 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLoUx-0001Uh-4y; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:33:03 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLoUv-0001UB-D4 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:33:01 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sLoUv-0001fm-2g for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:33:01 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sLoUv-0001w8-Qe for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:33:01 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: bug#71577: Some Images jobset lack artifacts Resent-From: Vincent Legoll Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: bug-guix@gnu.org Resent-Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:33:01 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 71577 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 71577@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 71577-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B71577.17192539407387 (code B ref 71577); Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:33:01 +0000 Received: (at 71577) by debbugs.gnu.org; 24 Jun 2024 18:32:20 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:35425 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sLoUF-0001v3-Vw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:32:20 -0400 Received: from mail-pl1-f169.google.com ([209.85.214.169]:50681) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1sLoUD-0001uo-Pf for 71577@debbugs.gnu.org; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 14:32:18 -0400 Received: by mail-pl1-f169.google.com with SMTP id d9443c01a7336-1f6a837e9a3so28444685ad.1 for <71577@debbugs.gnu.org>; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:32:16 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1719253871; x=1719858671; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=dc+4Gux+PFbRKBisWjJjiMHggw5GegP/kjBDGy2ctIY=; b=FQCKPgTCQ+EAgWdkJolB2+JyQ+VUFlAZWn1oCsLABAUgG+SaqoBrPPvOLtOsHJbtQx 28euuIwva1y9ArAAMOOV05xpP3mi5xPktDU9OOXHUUMlUp78AEg4Ig2crG1oLwYEieff M1RAjmB0K3hIxh/1R3CD5cvW/YDBihr7s9KJNjN0MNX+EO073Vhxsay/5eaZDZKj2nXQ IpPfZVW+Xb7X//qpUrxb+HN2t3EjfPY1rgTvrOZddBO769aFrWvyvwxzcIdt+puWa0rR 7h7jER4nuTXe6ajHdVfz64VmTYA+iEcxfo7oAdhu1B5G089zQNl8KxEoklRz+ApCpU0u tXKg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1719253871; x=1719858671; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=dc+4Gux+PFbRKBisWjJjiMHggw5GegP/kjBDGy2ctIY=; b=WdBMUEW5EivVFhzkvmR8IN6Rngo18FMuCX3I2TACvh0VzzM/TvwQccUhAlucHh6D/b H7IyXRixJjH5C+v7BkXYtBpUMzgeqwoXik4Svtlhy8IYCRQ4I+qQXKSAMriDTLUbyd4C rLLVEjZxmtGN+aUrm7JhIOi1knYszXQOERUL0rgkfnKZjSdmUhIiu0ySHAh4uJFF4jhU e68NF0HB0UmKZEd3Q42h7tsJJ/KuC3t9F3cqYThHYSokMa8+j/MGDc01Pf0MGm4FElDh uG+2lHGgCYbn0KfSkMXq048wsSf6NRbLE2+NNrOm/B5HLPgiJ69kMosvNB70VuZggpEe 2rTw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxAULBl3QqlBc6CnQ9aCsrOAmwURHhQi1bmiINd4UW2hU2w/Zjs 25IKJq/BzDU/o5RaIfith7RwcOFx1aEOCznXCXVA0B2A08Jeq2+40KAgP/aiYdeUguQz8kiYtbz 3zRdVyhScrIWY66oV2a2uSYou1v0= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE55arbvksVjinU7M7I8A/GcXdWXcQhLgiBc2Pqq9boYqw1GMzpi36pMygMnSMDTPCuUqSBaafIMaB0VKj83RI= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90b:214:b0:2c4:aab1:e435 with SMTP id 98e67ed59e1d1-2c861486196mr3375651a91.44.1719253870708; Mon, 24 Jun 2024 11:31:10 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87wmmek9nl.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87wmmek9nl.fsf@gnu.org> From: Vincent Legoll Date: Mon, 24 Jun 2024 18:30:59 +0000 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="0000000000003e14b1061ba6fc99" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: bug-guix@gnu.org List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: bug-guix-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: E785011D08 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -5.26 X-Spam-Score: -5.26 X-TUID: EutMFMAejrsm --0000000000003e14b1061ba6fc99 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello Ludo, On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 8:49=E2=80=AFAM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s = wrote: > Vincent Legoll skribis: > > > I wanted to try a fresh guix in a VM, but the "Download / Latest" > > page (1) does not have the: > > "QCOW2 virtual machine (VM) image" > > "GNU Guix 1.4.0 QEMU Image" > > that is available on the "Download / Standard" page (2) > > This is now fixed: > > https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/ > > For the record, the problem was that we=E2=80=99d be removing GC roots to= o > early, which was fixed here: > > > https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commit/?id=3D489fc= 437c7b3aa0af41a40d6090eb4c51ced0028 > Yes, I remember seeing some discussion about this. But I tried to have a new look at : https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/ But with another browser, another computer, reloading the page in firefox, or even forced reloading (CTRL+F5) I'm still not seeing the x86_64 qcow2. Is there some propagation delay, or something on my side that is wrong ? > > BTW, DL latest page also lacks checksum files to verify integrity. > > Since this process is automated, there cannot be a signature to verify > the authenticity of those binaries (integrity is most likely verified > indirectly via embedded checksums in the container formats). > That's why I spoke about checksum and not signatures, I'm not talking about authenticity, but just about DL checking. I don't really know if qcow has integrated checksums, but I doubt raw image does. So I think this could still have some usefulness. Thanks --=20 Vincent Legoll --0000000000003e14b1061ba6fc99 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello Ludo,

On Mon, Jun 24, 2024 at 8:49=E2= =80=AFAM Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.= org> wrote:
Vincent Legoll <vincent.legoll@gmail.com> skribis:

> I wanted to try a fresh guix in a VM, but the "Download / Latest&= quot;
> page (1) does not have the:
> "QCOW2 virtual machine (VM) image"
> "GNU Guix 1.4.0 QEMU Image"
> that is available on the "Download / Standard" page (2)

This is now fixed:

=C2=A0 https://guix.gnu.org/en/download/latest/

For the record, the problem was that we=E2=80=99d be removing GC roots too<= br> early, which was fixed here:

=C2=A0 https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/guix/maintenance.git/commi= t/?id=3D489fc437c7b3aa0af41a40d6090eb4c51ced0028
<= br>
Yes, I remember seeing some discussion about this.
=
But I tried to have a new look at :

But = with another browser, another computer, reloading the page in firefox,
or even forced reloading (CTRL+F5) I'm still not seeing the x86_6= 4 qcow2.

Is there some propagation delay, or s= omething on my side that is wrong ?
=C2=A0
> BTW, DL latest page also lacks checksum files to verify integrity.

Since this process is automated, there cannot be a signature to verify
the authenticity of those binaries (integrity is most likely verified
indirectly via embedded checksums in the container formats).

That's why I spoke about checksum and not signatu= res, I'm not talking
about authenticity, but just about DL ch= ecking.

I don't really know if qcow has integr= ated checksums, but I doubt raw
image does. So I think this could= still=C2=A0 have some usefulness.

<= div>Thanks

= --
Vincent Legoll
--0000000000003e14b1061ba6fc99--