Glad to help! It's an absolute delight to `guix environment -l guix.scm`
for every workflow and know that its gong to work.

On Sat, 30 Apr 2016 at 14:32 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net> wrote:

>
> Ben Woodcroft <donttrustben@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On 28/04/16 21:56, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> On 28/04/16 16:27, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> >>> Ben Woodcroft <woodibe@gmail.com> writes:
> >>>
> >>>> On 28/04/16 15:19, Ricardo Wurmus wrote:
> >>>>> Rob Syme <rob.syme@gmail.com> writes:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> * gnu/packages/patches/ruby-symlinkfix.patch: New patch to fix
> >>>>>> issue #1448.
> >>>>>> * gnu/packages/ruby.scm (ruby): Update to 2.3.1 including symlink
> >>>>>> patch.
> >>>>> Thank you!  The patch also needs to be registered in
> >>>>> dist_patch_DATA in
> >>>>> “gnu/local.mk”.  I can do this later when applying the patch in the
> >>>>> office, unless there are other objections to this patch.
> >>>> Do you mind holding off for a bit (no more than ~10 hours)? I wouldn't
> >>>> mind having a play with this myself.
> >>> No problem.  I can also apply this tomorrow if your tests find no
> >>> problems.  Thanks!
> >>
> >> Ruby-hashery now fails a unit test, but since that is a higher level
> >> package and ruby-ansi works I think it might be good to apply the
> >> patch here anyway. Would you mind please?
> >
> > I've just pushed a slightly modified version of Rob's patch and a patch
> > for ruby-hashery to master; I believe all the packages in
> > gnu/packages/ruby.scm build now.
>
> Thanks Ben, and thanks Rob for the patch!
>
> ~~ Ricardo
>
>