From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms8.migadu.com with LMTPS id mCtBAJOrpmUgSwEAqHPOHw:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:15:15 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0.migadu.com with LMTPS id mCtBAJOrpmUgSwEAqHPOHw (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:15:15 +0100 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=NZAtLiec; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1705421714; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:resent-cc:resent-from:resent-sender: resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references: list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe:list-subscribe:list-post: dkim-signature; bh=7fvO8eMnCUPnE8Uy51ndZiVDJnizgjP5zoXJu28E9no=; b=iaWASKqDV/Ut2gI9vIbFHBSzc3rnY67K890bTXuF6ZbvTlhkvJ8F/US6EvNL1fg6ZQy8MR uo5OMdE5PFk88g58PPf57k3Rr4yOpQuQneW38JrnmCVmCsOUOG1sCMfkFONm6t6Eq8mILm K5Tj87kpmW+VcJwuINTpcNRnygNCrUL5Xyj6RwQ7F+r8aMEU4MsEVeHs2hp7JefbBcQeOl 7Pak9rXp4zgm5W2zxzHYMA/U970Tj9qFl86qPa+ijmreyBnpwj4UUof+Nmy79WGo2RvnLx RBxtKehN31OeJJIVW9ABhDH1mZoHbCw5eph9aMjBWN6fDF//u2yzjLV10T/2Xw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com header.s=20230601 header.b=NZAtLiec; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1705421714; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=lb3JEvncJAVMdHnKgbdh/u28U5RA8umWOOWEOTpkygg+sr/rbEbMkOkKZ4nzCG4KMgBym2 9xTooOp2dmbu/jxZrwj25qPqGMwjbZP2llEEBH/QAZn2HS4xH5yEhAfkqUoPtDIMXmoUFP hEFVbI0Ex6LwAxANe5HgETg82fowZ0YMt5XvWxwfPvNTby23pqdY4qeNho1ygaY+tqzFW+ VQpvILyfdwyCn64ZnT+I54xblt47trByrCICi/DQ8e/OJnN9VbrwCaHXWNK/tckIOwwhjO bRBxgAQguzHcpfHkjMpDubacjFzJlvfuUUpnTG3HbFX0NuQBdBOPLPPKPhK79Q== Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id ABD6F16392 for ; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:15:14 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPm5i-0006eb-0V; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:15:06 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPm5e-0006eD-Sy for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:15:03 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:5::43]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1rPm5e-0000Cc-K7 for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:15:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPm5e-000314-AC for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:15:02 -0500 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#68257] [PATCH] gnu: mesa: Build asahi driver on aarch64. Resent-From: Roman Scherer Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:15:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 68257 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: To: John Kehayias Cc: Mathieu Othacehe , 68257@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 68257-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B68257.170542166211505 (code B ref 68257); Tue, 16 Jan 2024 16:15:02 +0000 Received: (at 68257) by debbugs.gnu.org; 16 Jan 2024 16:14:22 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:49526 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPm4z-0002zV-Kw for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:14:22 -0500 Received: from mail-ej1-x62e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::62e]:53366) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1rPm4x-0002zD-PA for 68257@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 11:14:20 -0500 Received: by mail-ej1-x62e.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a2821884a09so847555366b.2 for <68257@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:14:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=burningswell-com.20230601.gappssmtp.com; s=20230601; t=1705421653; x=1706026453; darn=debbugs.gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=7fvO8eMnCUPnE8Uy51ndZiVDJnizgjP5zoXJu28E9no=; b=NZAtLiecN+lnyu0jU+DckYrtkl/HpUwE3iKe8xRLzthjirwDk/M7uNynR9ylDEaJvk eJgM2/yK7jFruu8NUPKXCnxXgKQZN+rGJwAog7RELx+HhWrV+beMaBYGk/SenDb8uFLz YtEaXOP4fFbmz2eHZKVUsBVaRw/HdU3UTJdS+jRirL9+nr0exm5yhldZ5p9FwqnOnFTV 9Djo0/rt9eezuXw3JJzVVEL3H5/1VLwGrHpfnOQST6yO9oQiv5vBnNm5eL8Yy2bPcUQl xfnqMW98qityB8DU4M4SSlHrQW+FCABR3t4aiBX3hrfGmxeHPnJr6oeJO6hTKfSnUBZY lP2w== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1705421653; x=1706026453; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=7fvO8eMnCUPnE8Uy51ndZiVDJnizgjP5zoXJu28E9no=; b=KCqd8U2i2x4G8mPPREDS5488TnmgNDi1yLED5cnk01YZ2EEF6L8EAQE1MyhmDFxQov SyErB7J22uiiaIVCPx9TUU8jRP75flWxxhp86AvvU0uRgLsVHoHYwZ0++qoouWy39oqM 8SgrFHMioCdI/rggJ/6BDtsrjx1d1urAf4saFT09SlQGN2jn4UXVj5jc4Z0upvf7YFNM RDK8GEL+sQCb3nkS34m0b8B1Sjl1+LCWAS3HfF8mFJBcu0Wxc4SqE4np10vpqjFjLwTY VcBYGT1zQyZvU+mInvlTLMjWBBDQD0lBXk8/LY5taZf47fvr8hyxqHg93shUDgL7da1u Eqqw== X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YxGlwDKREQuYii5OhHZhSCceWuZYyKGbHmxGZD0A4LiQ3yjv35Q fju0+h+1dEEIoLnuT+sxwHM75NPSGog6EgkLOBc9px8Im+WdEOe7gnPni8QWARI= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IGVR0vfsIr172g0AsNn6eLNYi6kqss1nNlnzwbkYi3xSiyha0S3PZuRMHIOHKvl1cF6SCGZblGnJXSfFpCQw4I= X-Received: by 2002:a17:906:fe41:b0:a28:d396:6e8b with SMTP id wz1-20020a170906fe4100b00a28d3966e8bmr5072004ejb.34.1705421653271; Tue, 16 Jan 2024 08:14:13 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <1db5dc8e6e124b6c500f1e60b1f895bf95638169.1704451324.git.roman@burningswell.com> <874jfo9pdx.fsf@gnu.org> <875y01xqyv.fsf@gnu.org> <8734uydps7.fsf@protonmail.com> In-Reply-To: <8734uydps7.fsf@protonmail.com> From: Roman Scherer Date: Tue, 16 Jan 2024 17:14:02 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000d5f6ac060f126b66" X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.69 X-Spam-Score: -2.69 X-Migadu-Queue-Id: ABD6F16392 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-TUID: UCEgKYNaxYWM --000000000000d5f6ac060f126b66 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi John, thanks for your messages. Yes, let's see what happens with this patch in the core-updates branch. You are right, that it is a bit unrelated. I was only thinking about the large rebuild that is probably happening because of jemalloc, not that that branch got a new purpose. If it does not get merged with it, I would appreciate the patch being included in the next mesa-updates round. Roman On Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:35=E2=80=AFAM John Kehayias wrote: > Hello Roman, > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:27 PM, Roman Scherer wrote: > > > Hi Mathieu, > > > > ok, thank you. If there's anything I can do to move this forward, pleas= e > let me know. > > > > I see you just sent a message about applying this on core-updates. I thin= k > that can be fine since everything is being rebuilt there, if they don't > mind an unrelated patch. I don't see any issues with adding a driver, but > I'm not familiar much with aarch64. > > As for mesa-updates, I think the next round will be when mesa 24 hits > stable. They say that should be early February? Anyway, probably about a > month out. Happy to include this patch there if it doesn't make it for > core-updates. > > John > > > Thanks for your help! > > > > Roman > > > > On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:23=E2=80=AFPM Mathieu Othacehe > wrote: > > > > Hello, > > > > > It looks like this issue is now marked as "done" on Debuggs. > > > How can we proceed with this? > > > > I will re-open it as soon as debbugs is back. > > > > Mathieu > > --000000000000d5f6ac060f126b66 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hi John,

thanks for your mes= sages. Yes, let's see what happens with this patch in the core-updates = branch.
You are right, that it is a bit unrelated. I was only thi= nking about the large rebuild that is probably happening because of jemallo= c, not that that branch got a new purpose.

If it d= oes not get merged with it, I would appreciate the patch being included in = the next=C2=A0mesa-updates round.

Roman
<= /div>
O= n Tue, Jan 16, 2024 at 2:35=E2=80=AFAM John Kehayias <john.kehayias@protonmail.com> wrote:
Hello Roman,

On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 02:27 PM, Roman Scherer wrote:

> Hi Mathieu,
>
> ok, thank you. If there's anything I can do to move this forward, = please let me know.
>

I see you just sent a message about applying this on core-updates. I think = that can be fine since everything is being rebuilt there, if they don't= mind an unrelated patch. I don't see any issues with adding a driver, = but I'm not familiar much with aarch64.

As for mesa-updates, I think the next round will be when mesa 24 hits stabl= e. They say that should be early February? Anyway, probably about a month o= ut. Happy to include this patch there if it doesn't make it for core-up= dates.

John

> Thanks for your help!
>
> Roman
>
> On Wed, Jan 10, 2024 at 2:23=E2=80=AFPM Mathieu Othacehe <othacehe@gnu.org> wro= te:
>
>=C2=A0 Hello,
>
>=C2=A0 > It looks like this issue is now marked as "done" = on Debuggs.
>=C2=A0 > How can we proceed with this?
>
>=C2=A0 I will re-open it as soon as debbugs is back.
>
>=C2=A0 Mathieu

--000000000000d5f6ac060f126b66--