From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK Date: Sun, 10 Dec 2017 16:56:42 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20171204191506.GC28066@jasmine.lan> <87609h3dzk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e082658b0c91c9d055ffe76e1" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:40014) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO3y8-0003xA-V8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:56:45 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO3y8-0005Bs-49 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:56:45 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x230.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::230]:37469) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eO3y7-0005Ai-Ti for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 10:56:44 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x230.google.com with SMTP id d16so7120427iob.4 for ; Sun, 10 Dec 2017 07:56:43 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Chris Marusich Cc: guix-devel --089e082658b0c91c9d055ffe76e1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I've seen package: java-jgit-4.2 explicitly depending on icedtea-7 other explicit dependencies are for: icedtea-7 ant These are ok, I believe. We have ant/java8. What is the current status of these two: ant vs ant/java8, is ant/java8 the default? Should we do something with these? 2017-12-08 8:01 GMT+01:00 G=C3=A1bor Boskovits : > Ok, hopefully that will work out. However there was a hint yesterday, tha= t > newest core-updates is broken again after a recent merge... > It might worth to have a look around to see if it's woth to do on an olde= r > revision... > > I will wait for your results for now... > > Maybe later this weekend I can start up a few vm-s with guixsd, and have > those involved in rebuilding if needed... > > 2017-12-08 7:55 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich : > >> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: >> >> > sra-tools2.8.2-1 builds with no problem. >> >> Now that things are hopefully fixed up a bit more in core-updates I am >> trying again to build the "covering" of icedtea to see what still needs >> to be fixed. I'll let you know how that goes. >> >> -- >> Chris >> > > --089e082658b0c91c9d055ffe76e1 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I've seen package:
java-jgit-4.2 explicitly depend= ing on icedtea-7
other explicit dependencies are for:
i= cedtea-7
ant

These are ok, I believe.

We have ant/java8.

What is = the current status of these two:
ant vs ant/java8, is ant/java8 t= he default?
Should we do something with these?

=


2017-12-08 8:01 GMT+01:00 G=C3=A1bor Boskovits = <boskovits@gmai= l.com>:
Ok= , hopefully that will work out. However there was a hint yesterday, that ne= west core-updates is broken again after a recent merge...
It might wort= h to have a look around to see if it's woth to do on an older revision.= ..

I w= ill wait for your results for now...

Maybe later this weekend I can start up a fe= w vm-s with guixsd, and have those involved in rebuilding if needed...

2017-12-08 7:55 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>:
G=C3=A1bor Boskovits= <boskovits@gma= il.com> writes:

> sra-tools2.8.2-1 builds with no problem.

Now that things are hopefully fixed up a bit more in core-updates I = am
trying again to build the "covering" of icedtea to see what still= needs
to be fixed.=C2=A0 I'll let you know how that goes.

--
Chris


--089e082658b0c91c9d055ffe76e1--