From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: gnu: profanity: Modify build options. Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2019 14:10:41 +0200 Message-ID: References: <20191025095547.qywu6lgz46fh6hdn@rafflesia> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000abe1ab0595bb0a67" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:49408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNyQj-000798-Tp for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:10:59 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNyQi-0003YE-Im for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:10:57 -0400 Received: from mail-ed1-x52e.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52e]:35904) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1iNyQi-0003Xf-AC for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 08:10:56 -0400 Received: by mail-ed1-x52e.google.com with SMTP id bm15so1640275edb.3 for ; Fri, 25 Oct 2019 05:10:55 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <20191025095547.qywu6lgz46fh6hdn@rafflesia> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Tanguy Le Carrour Cc: Guix-devel --000000000000abe1ab0595bb0a67 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Tanguy Le Carrour ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019.= okt. 25., P=C3=A9n 11:59): > Hi Guix! > > Yesterday, I submitted a patch to update Profanity [1]. > > [1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D37903 > > My motivation was not to get the latest version of the software, but to > get the OMEMO encryption feature! This was only possible with versions > > 0.6. > > The question is now to know if I can/should modify the package's build > options and dependencies to enable OMEMO? I guess it make sense to have > encryption available by default. > > Another thing I would like to do is to enable profanity's "desktop" > features, > namely tray icon and notifications. Would it make sense to activate it > by default? Would it be better to create a `profanity-desktop` package > that modify the dependencies and the options?! > Usually the default package comes with as much functionality as possible. You could do a minimal package > > What do you think? > > -- > Tanguy > > --000000000000abe1ab0595bb0a67 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable


Tanguy Le Carrour <tanguy@bioneland.org> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. okt= . 25., P=C3=A9n 11:59):
Hi Guix!
Yesterday, I submitted a patch to update Profanity [1].

[1]: https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bu= greport.cgi?bug=3D37903

My motivation was not to get the latest version of the software, but to
get the OMEMO encryption feature! This was only possible with versions >= 0.6.

The question is now to know if I can/should modify the package's build<= br> options and dependencies to enable OMEMO? I guess it make sense to have
encryption available by default.

Another thing I would like to do is to enable profanity's "desktop= " features,
namely tray icon and notifications. Would it make sense to activate it
by default? Would it be better to create a `profanity-desktop` package
that modify the dependencies and the options?!
=
Usually the default package comes with as much functional= ity as possible. You could do a minimal package

What do you think?

--
Tanguy

--000000000000abe1ab0595bb0a67--