From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:60346) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4359-0007wF-Jx for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:34:04 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4358-0001an-CF for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:34:03 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:55839) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1h4358-0001aK-7k for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:34:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1h4357-00075i-UW for guix-patches@gnu.org; Wed, 13 Mar 2019 08:34:01 -0400 Subject: [bug#34613] Acknowledgement ([PATCH] gnu: Add prometheus.) Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <20190222114537.1431-1-boskovits@gmail.com> <87k1h5rr3k.fsf@gnu.org> <87d0mvay1m.fsf@gnu.org> In-Reply-To: <87d0mvay1m.fsf@gnu.org> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor?= Boskovits Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2019 13:33:24 +0100 Message-ID: Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c4e0910583f903fa" List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: 34613@debbugs.gnu.org, Pierre Neidhardt --000000000000c4e0910583f903fa Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hello, 2019. m=C3=A1rc. 13., Sze 11:06 d=C3=A1tummal Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ezt =C3=ADrta: > Hi, > > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > > > Ludovic Court=C3=A8s ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2019. = m=C3=A1rc. 11., H, > 23:20): > >> > >> Hi G=C3=A1bor! > >> > >> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > > > >> > >> Glyphicons appears to be non-free, indeed. Could you check what Debia= n > >> does, for instance? It may be that we can just remove or replace it > >> with something else. > > > > I've checked this, this is not actually included in the prometheus > > source anywhere, > > only copied from the influxdb license file. The only other appearance > > of glyphicons > > in the code is for the web interface, where it is part of bootstrap, > > and as such it is under > > apl2.0 there. > > > > I don't know if it is a problem to allow this influxdb module stub to > > live in the source, > > but I don't think so... (I would not consider this as a case of > > promoting use of non-free > > software.) Wdyt? > > What=E2=80=99s influxdb? I=E2=80=99m afraid I don=E2=80=99t understand t= his sufficiently well > to provide useful comments, but I trust you to make the right decision. > :-) > Influxdb is an optional dependency, you can configure prometheus to use it as storage. It is not included in any ways. What is included is a module that can connect to it. > > The thing is, Glyphicons does seem to be non-free, so if it ends up > being included one way or another, we have a problem. I would have > expected Debian to provide replacement icons or something like that. > In the case it is included, as part of bootstrap, it is under the apache license, because of a special agreement, that when it is part of bootstrap it is dual licensed to this effect. My current evaluation is that it is ok to include the package as is. > > Thanks, > Ludo=E2=80=99. > --000000000000c4e0910583f903fa Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

2019. m=C3=A1rc. 13., Sze 11:06 d=C3=A1tummal Ludovic Court=C3=A8s &l= t;ludo@gnu.org> ezt =C3=ADrta:
Hi,

G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:

> Ludovic Court=C3=A8s <ludo@gnu.org> ezt =C3=ADrta (id=C5=91pont: 2= 019. m=C3=A1rc. 11., H, 23:20):
>>
>> Hi G=C3=A1bor!
>>
>> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>>
>> Glyphicons appears to be non-free, indeed.=C2=A0 Could you check w= hat Debian
>> does, for instance?=C2=A0 It may be that we can just remove or rep= lace it
>> with something else.
>
> I've checked this, this is not actually included in the prometheus=
> source anywhere,
> only copied from the influxdb license file. The only other appearance<= br> > of glyphicons
> in the code is for the web interface, where it is part of bootstrap, > and as such it is under
> apl2.0 there.
>
> I don't know if it is a problem to allow this influxdb module stub= to
> live in the source,
> but I don't think so... (I would not consider this as a case of > promoting use of non-free
> software.) Wdyt?

What=E2=80=99s influxdb?=C2=A0 I=E2=80=99m afraid I don=E2=80=99t understan= d this sufficiently well
to provide useful comments, but I trust you to make the right decision.
:-)
Influxdb is an optional d= ependency, you can configure prometheus to use it as storage. It is not inc= luded in any ways. What is included is a module that can connect to it.

The thing is, Glyphicons does seem to be non-free, so if it ends up
being included one way or another, we have a problem.=C2=A0 I would have expected Debian to provide replacement icons or something like that.
In the case it is included, as part= of bootstrap, it is under the apache license, because of a special agreeme= nt, that when it is part of bootstrap it is dual licensed to this effect. M= y current evaluation is that it is ok to include the package as is.

Thanks,
Ludo=E2=80=99.
--000000000000c4e0910583f903fa--