From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: java: switch to icedtea-8 as default JDK Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2017 13:27:48 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20171204191506.GC28066@jasmine.lan> <87609h3dzk.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="94eb2c0b9c9c6e0070056023c724" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33834) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOjf5-0001ZJ-Ka for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 07:27:52 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOjf4-0000ko-GB for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 07:27:51 -0500 Received: from mail-it0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c0b::234]:45507) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eOjf4-0000kK-9d for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 07:27:50 -0500 Received: by mail-it0-x234.google.com with SMTP id z6so24101589iti.4 for ; Tue, 12 Dec 2017 04:27:50 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Chris Marusich Cc: guix-devel --94eb2c0b9c9c6e0070056023c724 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable minced is ok. 2017-12-12 12:30 GMT+01:00 G=C3=A1bor Boskovits : > Ok I've built ant 1.9.9 with ant/java8 and icedtea8. It is ok. > > 2017-12-10 16:56 GMT+01:00 G=C3=A1bor Boskovits : > >> I've seen package: >> java-jgit-4.2 explicitly depending on icedtea-7 >> other explicit dependencies are for: >> icedtea-7 >> ant >> >> These are ok, I believe. >> >> We have ant/java8. >> >> What is the current status of these two: >> ant vs ant/java8, is ant/java8 the default? >> Should we do something with these? >> >> >> >> 2017-12-08 8:01 GMT+01:00 G=C3=A1bor Boskovits : >> >>> Ok, hopefully that will work out. However there was a hint yesterday, >>> that newest core-updates is broken again after a recent merge... >>> It might worth to have a look around to see if it's woth to do on an >>> older revision... >>> >>> I will wait for your results for now... >>> >>> Maybe later this weekend I can start up a few vm-s with guixsd, and hav= e >>> those involved in rebuilding if needed... >>> >>> 2017-12-08 7:55 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich : >>> >>>> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits writes: >>>> >>>> > sra-tools2.8.2-1 builds with no problem. >>>> >>>> Now that things are hopefully fixed up a bit more in core-updates I am >>>> trying again to build the "covering" of icedtea to see what still need= s >>>> to be fixed. I'll let you know how that goes. >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Chris >>>> >>> >>> >> > --94eb2c0b9c9c6e0070056023c724 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
minced is ok.

2017-12-12 12:30 GMT+01:00 G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <bosk= ovits@gmail.com>:
Ok I've built ant 1.9.9 with ant/java8 and icedtea8. It is ok.=
2017-12-10 16:56 GMT+01:00 G=C3=A1bor Boskovit= s <boskovits@gmail.com>:
I've seen package:
java-jgit-4.2 explicitly depen= ding on icedtea-7
other explicit dependencies are for:
= icedtea-7
ant

These are ok, I believe.

We have ant/java8.

What is= the current status of these two:
ant vs ant/java8, is ant/java8 = the default?
Should we do something with these?


2017-12-08 8:01 GMT+01:00 G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <bosk= ovits@gmail.com>:
Ok, hopefully that will work out. However there was a hint yesterd= ay, that newest core-updates is broken again after a recent merge...
It= might worth to have a look around to see if it's woth to do on an olde= r revision...

I will wait for your results for now...

Maybe later this weekend I can st= art up a few vm-s with guixsd, and have those involved in rebuilding if nee= ded...

2017-12-08 7:= 55 GMT+01:00 Chris Marusich <cmmarusich@gmail.com>:
G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> write= s:

> sra-tools2.8.2-1 builds with no problem.

Now that things are hopefully fixed up a bit more in core-updates I = am
trying again to build the "covering" of icedtea to see what still= needs
to be fixed.=C2=A0 I'll let you know how that goes.

--
Chris




--94eb2c0b9c9c6e0070056023c724--