2018-02-08 19:42 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus : > > Ludovic Courtès writes: > > > To give some context, the issue is about the RISC-V port item at > > . > > > > I’m happy to help with Guix porting insight, but apart from that I’m not > > the most qualified person and I’d rather have someone else mentor it, if > > someone were to take this project. Any takers? > > > > Actually I’m unsure how good of a project it is for GSoC. GSoC is about > > development, but this one is not so much development, as Ricardo wrote > > in the context of Outreachy. > > It’s difficult to mentor a project like that; a consequence is that it > doesn’t really fit into the framework of GSoC, where mentors need to > have some way of deciding if the student is still on track (and fail the > student if necessary). > > For a project that is “follow the instructions” in the best case and > “wait for upstream to fix it” in the worst case, I really don’t feel > comfortable having this as a GSoC project. Problems encountered in the > porting effort are unforeseeable and could be outside the student’s > means to work around them — what do we do then? Fail the student? Pass > them by default? It doesn’t really make sense to me to have a project > that has big unknowns as dependencies. > > My opinion is to remove it from the list of GSoC ideas. > > > (RISC-V porting in itself does sound useful to me, just somewhat > > unsuitable for GSoC.) > > Same here. > > Ok, remove it from the list then. It really seems, that this project does not suit GSoC. I am interested in getting this work, but GSoC does not seem to be the place for this. > -- > Ricardo > > GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC > https://elephly.net > > > >