From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: Staging Date: Thu, 22 Feb 2018 18:29:29 +0100 Message-ID: References: <20180220014627.GA1984@jasmine.lan> <87371wco3n.fsf@fastmail.com> <87y3jloss4.fsf@elephly.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a114c9d88dc224e0565d062ee" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:60275) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eougW-0005wp-3J for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:29:33 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eougU-0007yd-U6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:29:32 -0500 Received: from mail-io0-x234.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c06::234]:39841) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eougU-0007y6-N7 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 12:29:30 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-x234.google.com with SMTP id b34so6812903ioj.6 for ; Thu, 22 Feb 2018 09:29:30 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87y3jloss4.fsf@elephly.net> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Ricardo Wurmus Cc: Guix-devel --001a114c9d88dc224e0565d062ee Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2018-02-22 18:09 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus : > > Marius Bakke writes: > > > Yes, let's start this in a few days, when Hydra calms down. Perhaps we > > can include the Java updates discussed in > > a= s > > well. Ricardo, WDYT? > > I didn=E2=80=99t have any time yet to check the Java updates, but they do= n=E2=80=99t > really affect many packages anyway (other than Java packages), so I > don=E2=80=99t think they=E2=80=99re all that critical. > > I tend to agree. The whole jdk closure is about 200 packages. Packages patched to work with java8 is on the order of 50, or so. Even if 200 is too much, we can delay flipping the defaults. Then the 50 in need of individual patches can go in. WDYT? > -- > Ricardo > > GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC > https://elephly.net > > > > --001a114c9d88dc224e0565d062ee Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2018= -02-22 18:09 GMT+01:00 Ricardo Wurmus <rekado@elephly.net>:=

Marius Bakke <mbakke@fastmail.com= > writes:

> Yes, let's start this in a few days, when Hydra calms down.=C2=A0 = Perhaps we
> can include the Java updates discussed in
> <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2018-02/msg00383.html> as
> well.=C2=A0 Ricardo, WDYT?

I didn=E2=80=99t have any time yet to check the Java updates, but th= ey don=E2=80=99t
really affect many packages anyway (other than Java packages), so I
don=E2=80=99t think they=E2=80=99re all that critical.


I tend to agree. The whole jdk closure is about 200 = packages.
Packages patched to work with java8 is on the order of = 50, or so.

Even if 200 is too much, we can delay f= lipping the defaults. Then the
50 in need of individual patches c= an go in. WDYT?
=C2=A0
--
Ricardo

GPG: BCA6 89B6 3655 3801 C3C6=C2=A0 2150 197A 5888 235F ACAC
https:= //elephly.net




--001a114c9d88dc224e0565d062ee--