Hello Chris,

Gábor Boskovits <boskovits@gmail.com> ezt írta (időpont: 2019. szept. 11.,
Sze, 12:44):

> Hello,
>
>
> >> > I would like to ask Ludo to file a request for a sub-repository to
>> >> > savannah-hackers, so that
>> >> > we could move the code there. Wdyt?
>> >>
>> >> That works for me :)
>> >>
>>
>
> This is now done.
>
>
>> >> I guess this kind of thing relates to the "Project Contribution
>> >> Information" part of the proposal. I think there's some other bits of
>> >> preparation to do for this, like:
>>
>
> I believe you could adopt some of the contribution information from Guix
> now,
> that this is officially associated with the community. You could also
> modify
> the community information to match with Guix. Does that make sense?
>
>
>> >>
>> >>  - Making sure the service is actually running publicly somewhere
>> (maybe
>> >>    milano-guix-1 if that's back working, maybe somewhere else if not)
>> >>
>>
>
> This is also done.
>
>
>> >>  - Generating a small sample database that can be used for local
>> >>    development
>> >>
>>
>
> This is still needed.
>
>
>> >>  - Writing some step-by-step instructions for running the service
>> >>    locally
>> >>
>>
>
> Did you have time to do this?
>
>
>> > The proposal is just a rough project outline, which can be refined
>> later,
>> > but should be in its final form by the 24, so that applicants reading it
>> > can have a rough estimate of the timeline, and of the milestones.
>>
>> Ok, that sounds fine.
>>
>> > Having starter tasks defined is actually outside the scope of
>> Outreachy, but
>> > an applicant must have a valid contribution to the project by the time
>> of
>> > intern
>> > selection. These are also very helpful for you to know what it would be
>> > like to with
>> > a given intern. I would say there is no strict timeline on this, but
>> very
>> > much reduces
>> > the communication overhead at the beginning, thus it is easier for you,
>> and
>> > more
>> > attractive to the applicants. Wdyt?
>>
>
>
>>
>> That all sounds fine to me, I've updated the application with some tasks
>> which I think would make good initial contributions. I'm not sure how
>> relevant I can make them to the project (without making them too
>> complicated), so I've just been looking for small improvements to the
>> exisiting functionality (mostly specifying JSON responses, where I
>> haven't).
>>
>
> I have seen the initial tasks, and they look good to me.
>
>
>> >> > Also, Ricardo brought to my attention the following things, that
>> could
>>
>> ...
>>
>> >> Some beginning, and sub-tasks need outlining, and once that is more
>> >> understood, hopefully we'll be in a better place to check if the above
>> >> is a reasonable goal. I think it would be also good to add some stretch
>> >> goals as well.
>> >>
>>
>
> From the main body of intern tasks, it would be nice to have the goals
> stated
> a bit more exlicitly, and to divide the work into stages a bit.
>
>
>> >
>> > Yes, stretch tasks also make sense. Later the applicants will also be
>> asked
>> > to
>> > a timeline. It is nice if they plan some spare time in their schedule,
>> so
>> > that they
>> > can stay on deadline, and be less stressed about it.
>>
>> Sounds good :)
>>
>
> Otherwise the proposal now looks to be in really good shape, so I wiil
> approve it
> once we have this few points sorted out.
>
> Best regards,
> g_bor
>
> --
> OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21
>

Did you have time to have a look at these?

I still see some missing TODO items on the proposal. Do you need any help?

Best regards,
g_bor
-- 
OpenPGP Key Fingerprint: 7988:3B9F:7D6A:4DBF:3719:0367:2506:A96C:CF63:0B21