From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Subject: Re: proposal: with-file-writeable Date: Wed, 14 Feb 2018 20:38:11 +0100 Message-ID: References: <87k1vfsmr7.fsf@gnu.org> <20180214191334.GA18223@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a1143f89a611ba0056531409e" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:51515) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1em2sh-0000rJ-Qq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:38:16 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1em2sg-0001Zq-TE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 14 Feb 2018 14:38:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20180214191334.GA18223@jasmine.lan> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: Guix-devel --001a1143f89a611ba0056531409e Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable 2018-02-14 20:13 GMT+01:00 Leo Famulari : > On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 02:51:08PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > G=C3=A1bor Boskovits skribis: > > > > > the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me, it > would > > > look better if we could have a with-file-writeable function, so that > we can > > > constrain the size effect, and more. Moreover if a file is read-only = to > > > start with, it might be a good idea to keep it that way anyways. WDYT= ? > > > > Which =E2=80=98make-file-writeable=E2=80=99 function? I don=E2=80=99t = see it in master. > > There was a typo; it's ((guix build utils) make-file-writable) > Sorry, yes, my mistake, it's really ((guix build utils) make-file-writable). --001a1143f89a611ba0056531409e Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
2018= -02-14 20:13 GMT+01:00 Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>:
=
On Wed, Feb 14, 2018 at 02:= 51:08PM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> G=C3=A1bor Boskovits <boskov= its@gmail.com> skribis:
>
> > the make-file-writeable function seems a bit too imperative to me= , it would
> > look better if we could have a with-file-writeable function, so t= hat we can
> > constrain the size effect, and more. Moreover if a file is read-o= nly to
> > start with, it might be a good idea to keep it that way anyways. = WDYT?
>
> Which =E2=80=98make-file-writeable=E2=80=99 function?=C2=A0 I don=E2= =80=99t see it in master.

There was a typo; it's ((guix build utils) make-file-writable)

Sorry, yes, my mist= ake, it's really=C2=A0=C2=A0((gu= ix build utils) make-file-writable).


=
--001a1143f89a611ba0056531409e--