From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Vong Subject: Re: Plan for 0.9.0 Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2015 23:01:35 +0800 Message-ID: References: <87io6b943m.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:35919) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm157-0005HM-KE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:01:38 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zm156-0003pn-GP for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 13 Oct 2015 11:01:37 -0400 In-Reply-To: List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org To: Daniel Pimentel Cc: guix-devel , guix-devel-bounces+d4n1=opmbx.org@gnu.org Regarding gc, I remember I accidentally ran "guix gc" and removed all the build dependencies like bash, glibc... Then, I realized the proper way to run gc is to run "guix gc -d ". Perhaps we should change the command for garbage collecting everything from "guix gc" to "guix gc -a" and "guix gc --all". Does this sound reasonable? On 13/10/2015, Daniel Pimentel wrote: > What do you think about add alias "clean" to "gc"? > > For example: > "guix clean" as alias to "guix gc" > > > -- > Daniel Pimentel (d4n1 3:) > >