From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Plan for 0.9.0
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 19:09:41 +0800
Message-ID: <CADrxHD-6Z5MC_oi+B4JUMDU_LSx+=XFic7EO=CGE5FYZTXsT9A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <87io6b943m.fsf@gnu.org>
	<b9132ab973693dadbef5d7e2cdf79df4@openmailbox.org>
	<CADrxHD8SaeyP_muApbbs-zoAmygh2v8QmgPpY1muQFDg7-cVJQ@mail.gmail.com>
	<878u75ql2q.fsf@gnu.org> <87eggxfc5o.fsf@openmailbox.org>
	<87k2qpp1ko.fsf@gnu.org> <20151014170227.3a293b5a@openmailbox.org>
	<874mhsiae1.fsf@openmailbox.org>
	<CAJ=RwfZwzO2-8cDC9pCgd_Tq4DGatnVJH5fqXnURVUpDLEBrTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<CADrxHD-zvD8rQO3=Y8zEDPifzoeQ3qowbSk_=XKQn=ChFGwY_w@mail.gmail.com>
	<87oafzz28v.fsf@openmailbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48989)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alexvong1995@gmail.com>) id 1Zn2td-0001Xg-Tj
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:10:02 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alexvong1995@gmail.com>) id 1Zn2tK-0001DI-F2
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:09:58 -0400
Received: from mail-ig0-x22c.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22c]:35390)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <alexvong1995@gmail.com>) id 1Zn2tK-0001Cj-AU
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 07:09:42 -0400
Received: by igbkq10 with SMTP id kq10so10495172igb.0
	for <guix-devel@gnu.org>; Fri, 16 Oct 2015 04:09:41 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <87oafzz28v.fsf@openmailbox.org>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
To: Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@openmailbox.org>
Cc: guix-devel <guix-devel@gnu.org>

On 16/10/2015, Mathieu Lirzin <mthl@openmailbox.org> wrote:
> Alex Vong <alexvong1995@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> Talking about interactive CLIs, in general I am not a fan of it too,
>> especially after you get used to the program. That's why I am using
>> plain apt-get instead of aptitude which uses ncurses. However, I will
>> say it is sometimes useful.
>
> Isn't =E2=80=98apt-get upgrade=E2=80=99 interactive ?
>
You are right. :) But you can add -y to bypass the question.
So it seems there are really 3 ways to do it.

1. no interaction at all (Do what I say!)
2. ask a "big" yes/no question (like interactive `apt-get')
3. ask for every directories (like interactive `rm')

Cheers,
Alex