From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp2.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms13.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6MNyOyuXxWaKNAEAe85BDQ:P1 (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 07:28:44 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:303:e224::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp2.migadu.com with LMTPS id 6MNyOyuXxWaKNAEAe85BDQ (envelope-from ) for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 09:28:44 +0200 X-Envelope-To: larch@yhetil.org Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=gsYSt1o9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1724225323; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=TUDzxswqLNT6nyMVYJXA9fzXGb3N1rOM9vGBtSRAC/c=; b=U2zb1RX6KWn9D54llWvAxp5ikrRW/jLgk9MnPU4faFjXYAllJSUu6aT7H9JfS3olQG+O3a YSPdwY7x5su3iJtPQ1xXXJslpxqmagkIgctQwwpq2ARAh0AniFJoaowhB3cQ7Vf8NcuyDE +kA8nSluKaKMlICoZk+/BPWz1P1hghNc9jAGrMDowRihUOv3QIj+GDdq1j6CSa7pUBUMze 6QWsBab0VqX94WvpPA0MnQGq+Za2dIJzJEnBSFXEyaKpYAGYDal5p2hP6ZKZM8EauRWLc+ Wg1+O3NtD/0eMHkYqfITqCSgbAAJge+bnZQlcgnYPlKFGb80SimY1NcyhFhvzA== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1724225323; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=rrv3/S1YsrTLCnamAeNi9BA4c4K64xqTr8swQB/Tuv6jU5lthOFWP0EuM4Q2Ydm1qQfHaX pTbooArvdJYDDdVhr3YPCP+frn7PlJ3H9HrRJNILFUwV5v0iRm26Iz5ULf8ENJHpxW2XpG OXtrlR3lCC4Qu4suznUiZPKF/4RGexDM2odASeTf+UpPz8ClKRj3l+xe8nkRvIp+C8QSDs 91B4sBLxkoY52z+kZDFycQbEDO92cMqkkzlXYM5V9X0oKe6kD3e6RBkwKLKYAhgc4sS+NS HJabvyXfjMYYMlr+e4HlQkMozU8TCOudyiNyY303GQI9CSTe+1nOJGjr1ToH1A== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=pass header.d=gmail.com header.s=20230601 header.b=gsYSt1o9; dmarc=pass (policy=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6F42A6AF88 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 09:28:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgflE-0008CF-KE; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 03:28:04 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgflD-0008Bz-I3 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 03:28:03 -0400 Received: from mail-ej1-x636.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::636]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sgflB-0003nv-PJ for guix-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 03:28:03 -0400 Received: by mail-ej1-x636.google.com with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a83597ce5beso77701166b.1 for ; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:28:01 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20230601; t=1724225280; x=1724830080; darn=gnu.org; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=TUDzxswqLNT6nyMVYJXA9fzXGb3N1rOM9vGBtSRAC/c=; b=gsYSt1o90r18FrxoFjRLeuS5nQKPloOdi+g2KsoGW+zCQWMi8tC6E8unp2xCINSfOP jojefl2IQo0xOOjhXAowtfB0VVQePvCZoTJaRzHRorIf+X0zHzvEgiP5x7M9YL/NDWlo tfJ2tKjsIK0vVGeFw0YNt5a5KUys7DRVEpJuO1nkyO2nmfXBxoNF+etnXz4BzV+N+SOl A2Vhgej2+XLjnW5EOxBO12jtLwzh4Sn+/Lod21r1zq+fH5q6nbZ1aNmeuN96gH2Xmulf 4p3a3E+rBu7kO06wNWmWLAUNtTePdwPX3edGw/mHGloGdDCrXb7VrICNKn76yD878DUW k8LQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20230601; t=1724225280; x=1724830080; h=cc:to:subject:message-id:date:from:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id :reply-to; bh=TUDzxswqLNT6nyMVYJXA9fzXGb3N1rOM9vGBtSRAC/c=; b=npk4w03S/H+Q3YDwHaQTUG1IZ5embt42tF3vTl2yQbwX0zdk2OVl4majvLB2FnkxKl CBDnTrGZEpH7l6KvVvCTLfkWLaKEteATFTP5BZ26sLAPNnqNVTAgpOWK0utz0V/eKl2X AW4SSqqyO6mMYZMex9WY6EonazLzN35LkXVpa6cFpmJaw9M8a3Qg/zBlWjij/QEgR7Ij h81I5rGktgGK5R4Ix27mNQUk8zXtC76xvmu6l7jtunogQp2wZ8QY5fg6shrUrtUbK754 YjvWi2AZj+LutjPkTwfus4Ri8O1Gqq/2PjWW4iXs7cDZCmoZ5H94eG/BTF4EZF1SNKPi jubQ== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AJvYcCUudVGBzj+ttRvt09GccN6gmkHSoNRj4kCOm0wwqu5pcMn5Qywk8m27cH2fSNHfiVRpgPPuble6o6PT@gnu.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwiYWwLCSB3B8oID8Xf9PZhQQO3aXIDwSdcCGz3sWo2sKmv3Ngh BCTB9O7cKvNTTfxhU0eNc1frLVB449AXOCOZ4gSaZHDqJbnWwopI9UrnV/4awA1gEsrOwCbWAUH Sbg5CGbshAEmoKhp8Ni6Apccp6eXK6E/z X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGHT+IE6JEPTz5IgY0Gm5vLMDm0F8zAK8/lGKymv6952gdX0Jn7OHailgVw53Z3aeSZQ2UBTovEhrhoTC7jXc3TYW4U= X-Received: by 2002:a17:907:1b2a:b0:a86:668a:8b28 with SMTP id a640c23a62f3a-a8670182bd0mr156072566b.30.1724225279840; Wed, 21 Aug 2024 00:27:59 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87jzgbo6hp.fsf@marekpasnikowski.pl> <87jzgb49rr.fsf@gmail.com> <87frqy4b7r.fsf@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <87frqy4b7r.fsf@gmail.com> From: Sarthak Shah Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 12:57:47 +0530 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Global modification of #:make-flags To: Suhail Singh Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?Marek_Pa=C5=9Bnikowski?= , Guix Devel Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000051568c06202c7b94" Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::636; envelope-from=shahsarthakw@gmail.com; helo=mail-ej1-x636.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 6F42A6AF88 X-Migadu-Scanner: mx12.migadu.com X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -9.79 X-Spam-Score: -9.79 X-TUID: EOkT7iLTVheU --00000000000051568c06202c7b94 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Hey Suhail, I was thinking about having a conversation in a guix-devel email thread itself. >From my understanding, debbugs issues are meant for technical features or issues pending implementation, while guix-devel threads are meant for discussions surrounding Guix and possible features. This is why I had linked the relevant mailing list thread in my blog post as well. Regards, Sarthak. On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 12:25 Suhail Singh wrote: > Sarthak Shah writes: > > > I think starting a debbugs issue could be a good idea once everyone's > > onboard with getting this patch merged! > > I'm not sure I agree that consensus has to be a pre-requisite for > creating an issue. > > > Right now, from what I gather, there are some more important > conversations > > to be had, mainly with the Guix maintainers, as merging this patch could > > lead to a sharp, unexpected increase in complexity if we do not have > proper > > guidelines and procedures in place for parameterization. > > Creation of an issue doesn't imply that the patch (series) has to be > merged (in its current form or otherwise). On the other hand, creation > of an issue allows for feedback to be gathered in one place. In fact, I > would argue that there's value in creating an issue even before any code > towards a patch has been written (by, say, submitting a feature request > to ). > > If not on an issue, where do you intend to have the conversations you > alluded to above? > > -- > Suhail > --00000000000051568c06202c7b94 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hey Suhail,
I was thinking about having = a conversation in a guix-devel email thread itself.
=
From my understanding, debbugs issues are meant= for technical features or issues pending implementation, while guix-devel = threads are meant for discussions surrounding Guix and possible features.

This is why I had linked = the relevant mailing list thread in my blog post as well.

Regards,
Sarthak.<= /div>

On Wed, Aug 21, 2024, 12:25 Suhail Singh <suhailsingh247@gmail.com> wrote:
Sarthak Shah <shahsarthakw@gmail.com>= writes:

> I think starting a debbugs issue could be a good idea once everyone= 9;s
> onboard with getting this patch merged!

I'm not sure I agree that consensus has to be a pre-requisite for
creating an issue.

> Right now, from what I gather, there are some more important conversat= ions
> to be had, mainly with the Guix maintainers, as merging this patch cou= ld
> lead to a sharp, unexpected increase in complexity if we do not have p= roper
> guidelines and procedures in place for parameterization.

Creation of an issue doesn't imply that the patch (series) has to be merged (in its current form or otherwise).=C2=A0 On the other hand, creatio= n
of an issue allows for feedback to be gathered in one place.=C2=A0 In fact,= I
would argue that there's value in creating an issue even before any cod= e
towards a patch has been written (by, say, submitting a feature request
to <bug-guix@gnu.org>).

If not on an issue, where do you intend to have the conversations you
alluded to above?

--
Suhail
--00000000000051568c06202c7b94--