From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms0.migadu.com with LMTPS id QOtwOwF69GHcEgEAgWs5BA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:19:29 +0100 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:8:6d80::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id +LDhOAF69GGUbQEA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:19:29 +0100 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A7C0F1ED8B for ; Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:19:29 +0100 (CET) Received: from localhost ([::1]:57534 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDaWe-0005jS-Q3 for larch@yhetil.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 18:19:28 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:39562) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDaOo-0001Bw-OU for guix-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 18:11:22 -0500 Received: from [2607:f8b0:4864:20::629] (port=39659 helo=mail-pl1-x629.google.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1nDaOl-0007eH-3l; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 18:11:22 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-x629.google.com with SMTP id x11so7535163plg.6; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:10:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=tSzD0XKVBFMVsyEuT0iqJeEQ4V0+79O+JLxkoz72ehg=; b=EW68TjeoJnBLGpdQkpo8uG4YPd3TytuTPbIiZCSPSXb+c3Tx2xLT1+vgGdJq+/H+B8 zHTYWRecyofvpkKPoqMLNPJswrULgyBr640qsu3cCKdLr3QmcDiM8nTBE3qHpEzBmUo1 Jg41t8PeZ7C6M3XCqFokX4sSzq13azRn6h1l3N1hglBo2ZF50E4vvbYN0QN0wPlDKzO7 cv5+G1Mno6f9PjJmN9Ff9ZgokroC5u7yE41DpLJiaj4jkdcQPmnPa1Gvzk1Bxv1ouvpc oHugytZJ+M4V1YyUJB2YlIwEzC/WFHXls7qqWR/ZSxUJ4BjFiRb7ThaT0DVAlB/JFDyp NUUQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=tSzD0XKVBFMVsyEuT0iqJeEQ4V0+79O+JLxkoz72ehg=; b=XNxnE9zl9YnndrpkA6ppZ6QdxSBnfvOahHot+g/rEBphHX2Z25sRaZuQD8j7kDL5Wr Jp4tASRiGNFDqPy1d3dGZy7xewhIzZkZtnQ+RGh4CcrMp+ZpUuiQe1BfC7pYc4gz+XjQ eQumqnbT4rrkJ+0sEnc8gI+pd87YZQHGyxHwoBgl1hVeS9zfXfLGKTsx7k05YZVm4z7m BLVE1zz4ttdjtYsz9k+mVaJNdGeqSSb52q2ofrERudPccQoknmgaAcsnxWKrWFrTTVrJ QhoacKG0JV+MuToS03Omsq0YIG5g26p3PgjQzxIoS6g+T/5QaTsJukTr+L0JCrs7qclU kZFA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532NSpPrqAlWRkb8ttw+cil+n6Yc1OO3zae2YWLGXzJ4uukYpPWB oz31QHq7h7s+PZXE2rwVW/Al30+Ppi+4+g21NtLgH3ox X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxbgF7yLYHeMnLANDhQvITqYvWMDIfU1ruht34W+kNDZ6hQLstiwsKUjZ300ir0kW4hLEWDl6vR2nifKnaOzlo= X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:be15:: with SMTP id a21mr12333713pjs.36.1643411416136; Fri, 28 Jan 2022 15:10:16 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <87bkzykfyc.fsf@inria.fr> <20220127161559.v2xmkn2sfv5blhjv@pelzflorian.localdomain> In-Reply-To: <20220127161559.v2xmkn2sfv5blhjv@pelzflorian.localdomain> From: =?UTF-8?Q?G=C3=A1bor_Boskovits?= Date: Sat, 29 Jan 2022 00:10:04 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Clarifying blog post licensing To: "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000adc0d005d6ac89b7" X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2607:f8b0:4864:20::629 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::629; envelope-from=gboskovits@gmail.com; helo=mail-pl1-x629.google.com X-Spam_score_int: 6 X-Spam_score: 0.6 X-Spam_bar: / X-Spam_report: (0.6 / 5.0 requ) DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, PDS_HP_HELO_NORDNS=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Guix Devel , GNU Guix maintainers Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1643411969; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=tSzD0XKVBFMVsyEuT0iqJeEQ4V0+79O+JLxkoz72ehg=; b=BRWqEeo0n005+aBaTxqOCTpKK84gdsKlTlw0EEIBpcNLA3fyc+u+esz85lRs5gx19c1NRG lUHWFfWinrpIF+O/vLrWm/W6z/p791F8aQtc2//2qGNYQfqlwzfeFeSbb7Kqca7FPSmFQ7 dBS5hHvwHHvA8GQih4Lx+fqTEMqhG+mu1GeX8oB9e+MDt8/gdZSHh2UP9EQ77+Y+AckIX3 hlcywUDPihvwkC/huWRROqsctHf5m0YXLgTIJnfrF93B5H3yWsewnpebSx9eXQWlB9RBr7 jQwfqs5xHN+wZ7i9XBYUkFsM7zKzWbHsIrXsygXeckiyFx1GgOFAa8TW0i1zbw== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1643411969; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=ryNeYc/PybBorW/J4DdYKODFuYFtO2R3zBaBeVW+DgboIcJIw+wz4KK93DmAg2vQTCkoG7 tui9vFIExApGvDLfR75Jwcc3CLohS/IF5HuxL5OcA/H/DW4E6T6xdz0a0KDsLwAMQST2Ke 8MbcGVvGCzBd8yMuRjo5cewbICwfHrIaeVYAX5i3s3UiC6sjjhWBBEV+O3bMWUiaRXOIuJ BQuI+D+ocC203vWK3IGjtFxi2zy8WESHQEf3fYsexOJceAa00DsQaC/95LhJpdSViQvCL0 4BGimQTBLtKtPth1ptR+6+MREu+cRyL38jZ5YS76qDf4SRufOi6vMr9NT6LXnA== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=EW68Tjeo; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -2.03 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=gmail.com header.s=20210112 header.b=EW68Tjeo; dmarc=fail reason="SPF not aligned (relaxed)" header.from=gmail.com (policy=none); spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: A7C0F1ED8B X-Spam-Score: -2.03 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: W5oQVQ2kAHey --000000000000adc0d005d6ac89b7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable I agree. pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) ezt =C3=ADrta (id= =C5=91pont: 2022. jan. 27., Cs 18:35): > I agree. > > On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote: > > Hello Guix! > > > > With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is > > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside > > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixin= g > > it). > > > > I=E2=80=99d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts saying= that, > > unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 and > > GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in > > the manual). Patch below. > > > > What do people think? > > > > If maintainers and everyone agrees, I=E2=80=99d like to publicly email = all the > > authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing > > terms, or whether they=E2=80=99d like a different free license. The sc= ript > > below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup > > still): > > --000000000000adc0d005d6ac89b7 Content-Type: text/html; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I agree.

pelzflorian (Florian Pelz) <pelzflorian@pelzflorian.de> ezt =C3=ADrt= a (id=C5=91pont: 2022. jan. 27., Cs 18:35):
I agree.

On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:24:11AM +0100, Ludovic Court=C3=A8s wrote:
> Hello Guix!
>
> With a few exceptions, our blog posts do not have a license, which is<= br> > not great as it prevents sharing and reuse, at least by those outside<= br> > Guix circles (we discussed it in the past but never got around to fixi= ng
> it).
>
> I=E2=80=99d like us to clarify that, with a footer on blog posts sayin= g that,
> unless otherwise stated, posts are dual-licensed under CC-BY-SA 4.0 an= d
> GFDL 1.3+ (the latter so we can reuse material in the cookbook and in<= br> > the manual).=C2=A0 Patch below.
>
> What do people think?
>
> If maintainers and everyone agrees, I=E2=80=99d like to publicly email= all the
> authors asking them whether they agree with the proposed licensing
> terms, or whether they=E2=80=99d like a different free license.=C2=A0 = The script
> below enumerates blog post authors (the list needs a bit of cleanup > still):

--000000000000adc0d005d6ac89b7--