From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp11.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms5.migadu.com with LMTPS id OMdrA1ED12IXBAAAbAwnHQ (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:17:37 +0200 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:bcc0::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp11.migadu.com with LMTPS id CHSPA1ED12KqDQAA9RJhRA (envelope-from ) for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:17:37 +0200 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 922DB11133 for ; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 21:17:36 +0200 (CEST) Received: from localhost ([::1]:52904 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDsit-0005NL-MG for larch@yhetil.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:17:35 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:58698) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDsiO-0005LW-9I for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:17:05 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.43]:57407) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oDsiM-0004mo-EG for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:17:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oDsiM-0007mZ-9u for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:17:02 -0400 X-Loop: help-debbugs@gnu.org Subject: [bug#54832] [patch] update glibc to 2.35 Resent-From: Greg Hogan Original-Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-CC: guix-patches@gnu.org Resent-Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 19:17:02 +0000 Resent-Message-ID: Resent-Sender: help-debbugs@gnu.org X-GNU-PR-Message: followup 54832 X-GNU-PR-Package: guix-patches X-GNU-PR-Keywords: patch To: zamfofex Cc: Ludovic =?UTF-8?Q?Court=C3=A8s?= , Maxime Devos , 54832@debbugs.gnu.org Received: via spool by 54832-submit@debbugs.gnu.org id=B54832.165825819229871 (code B ref 54832); Tue, 19 Jul 2022 19:17:02 +0000 Received: (at 54832) by debbugs.gnu.org; 19 Jul 2022 19:16:32 +0000 Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:55166 helo=debbugs.gnu.org) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oDshs-0007lj-7i for submit@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:16:32 -0400 Received: from mail-yw1-f181.google.com ([209.85.128.181]:38666) by debbugs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1oDshq-0007lU-3e for 54832@debbugs.gnu.org; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:16:30 -0400 Received: by mail-yw1-f181.google.com with SMTP id 00721157ae682-31e45527da5so52910757b3.5 for <54832@debbugs.gnu.org>; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:16:30 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=greghogan-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com; s=20210112; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yIHw0cFpTlTKAOCn6PzBybW61NgWuKmrg+u1FkxSouw=; b=kd/NVxhF06SnOgB1DDamQsxU51RkruYWpuzhTa4qhBWIJF7d3gQrf/TqFmhjxlJRBN RIypVLSg1aTujlp5aDdipLIlZ75a3jKMw44po/WsysRHNy7AQTKbl2KWutZnqdDfAabl YASKVImfJT6Luk3TA/pN7JemZHlu6Y7JKZI0WeMkAlrtax9qiAMHgdZVvNQEtMPg6aow UfNeFlu6L+ycEeVI8vlvYa0LAh63OEfQ+Iqd8ulAdtoWjNMbKCRw0QQ9/WaVBQnsatpV TFOV4Ic0IwZN8q6naEyv7oWxeQecJvIVfi/0Ib0ELGzpWYHCdPnW5mTNHD/ARZLfYyj1 3mWg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-transfer-encoding; bh=yIHw0cFpTlTKAOCn6PzBybW61NgWuKmrg+u1FkxSouw=; b=tlOjkxFSTLUHoJBrixNQDlKjvdgTEcbt9zxn+TzZBA+swGWNmr9zlHSVw96Bel35Jw XSZbmqR1WyB6IHLuEu/+9yAeIFFdrvNz3LlPmaNuQeniOtqbO1PpidFkOOyyi26TJpIV mtE4I/vPxWZwDI9PGWF+tf1vkucVYuW734K5t3uULQs4JjpGjHeSpHwqCR3wAevWbAOX R7X+yHZF4BhwKUwlcGUS4v6rfffzL2F4x5Sfxa+3avvXDKeRovzvk8svvPUoMo7T4A7q NaFkn/jFAzjuEhslU7s4ZlRZzCpC2Mi/wZqcN2GqqpMly3/bj1EKfO7rxaKj3luGouqK BzWA== X-Gm-Message-State: AJIora8jFi46hs48bbKIpBeOuOOtH8BKg3DMTzJTyy5KpNRqGfWf5l+k R/r5PSC/HtwaHki9G7aSBaFFuZxKXOOuXjV7TXEvyw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: AGRyM1tD9IaXpSgpFCFzkdF2JRx/JBPVeZ2UAS9mSMU2riSImXRtiAKmmC2XnfF2nvfzKfDy8XrHbtbeVLwh9OUfGcU= X-Received: by 2002:a81:5803:0:b0:31e:5ac9:fdc4 with SMTP id m3-20020a815803000000b0031e5ac9fdc4mr5282933ywb.511.1658258184547; Tue, 19 Jul 2022 12:16:24 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <935236349.13698.1649553391613@privateemail.com> <87r14ubhyu.fsf@gnu.org> <818784149.855838.1654517187059@privateemail.com> <874jzg59zc.fsf_-_@gnu.org> <1143838129.1375777.1658239971665@privateemail.com> In-Reply-To: <1143838129.1375777.1658239971665@privateemail.com> From: Greg Hogan Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2022 15:16:12 -0400 Message-ID: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-BeenThere: debbugs-submit@debbugs.gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list X-BeenThere: guix-patches@gnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-To: larch@yhetil.org X-Migadu-Country: US ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yhetil.org; s=key1; t=1658258256; h=from:from:sender:sender:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding:resent-cc: resent-from:resent-sender:resent-message-id:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references:list-id:list-help:list-unsubscribe: list-subscribe:list-post:dkim-signature; bh=yIHw0cFpTlTKAOCn6PzBybW61NgWuKmrg+u1FkxSouw=; b=lPsab0i/Hfv5uJDpKNBV841WxmtrVoTwgodSAkrf6hpL3m1ry+FM7pke2XcvrBfsYSE5un T4qHpPbgAmb+P94p3pmvhFgUbU0mYWn/ieRajIncP1cb+h1ATPFbdEsIY1yqcNJam9ArU3 OR/fgzB4ITkhGx0yV6mjnV5VFVUTrQ9OQ23Jdtfbr8+dVKKubFIedITOOSIM/54hGe4GYu nzUpzv+aGW83I2BRtnGJPggJ4MHbQKlzbIDhOXZ66oclNEftOX3e+DaVdP1FirYFoNU43Z DspMxO1vKERg2q634TksjTmy2cWNqa5K3a76t6hkPrXM3DAwX+tzcxxN4qlbVg== ARC-Seal: i=1; s=key1; d=yhetil.org; t=1658258256; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=btse1bEp18DpjtOM8hGtyVEGkTZA++5rzOycrqaw/ZW6ZJ0gmz+LDqevGa1tgwWEp4bD+8 zSrmbhqlTUqc9QFV1DGDfH7pBdAteRH3nQ9pdKD6hBq7GguVZPHG7dgisqas5aF0bOjxOz hbZ7XqGq5a/JzSQKW8P8uL4aQW3Rm4MRsXag17xKzl8MtQ6s8pQDySkHN7/KpUX5sSLD1/ BYNwFgsecE8feTEJn61ifqdYfuEloxQ/a0gBLqHRgmkP66+Gxu0DKh9WFcgrbg9+2tpyoc yNKwIq6PPkxKpd0s7To6mrU+k11sdMKk89Xh4dxg431l5Hh3NooEkA1TUOh+Mw== ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=greghogan-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b="kd/NVxhF"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Spam-Score: 0.27 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=fail ("headers rsa verify failed") header.d=greghogan-com.20210112.gappssmtp.com header.s=20210112 header.b="kd/NVxhF"; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of "guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom="guix-patches-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org" X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 922DB11133 X-Spam-Score: 0.27 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn0.migadu.com X-TUID: ZBeDEHPQmjMY On Tue, Jul 19, 2022 at 12:14 PM zamfofex wrote: > > > There=E2=80=99s a comment at the top of =E2=80=98glibc-dl-cache.patch= =E2=80=99 that explains > > what it does, but see > > > > for details. I can take a look and update it. > > It seems we both misinterpreted the diff I had sent originally, as that p= atch has not actually been removed, but rather its line was changed (it was= moved upwards). So good news, no need for changes or further investigation= ! I have used your patch to bootstrap with GCC 12 (in order to use both gcc-12 and llvm-14 in the same profile) and I have found that without "glibc-ldd-x86_64.patch", sometimes ldd will throw a "not a dynamic executable" error. I assume the powerpc patch is likewise still required. > Thanks for the encouragement! However, since glibc 2.36 releases a few we= eks from now, do you feel like it would make sense to wait until then to up= date it? I suppose it could always be updated again later, but I don=E2=80= =99t know if that=E2=80=99s ideal. I would like to see the 2.35 upgrade since others may benefit before the 2.36 release and in case of a core-updates merge to master. Greg