I don't know what happened there. Attached and copied below is the correct patch off core-updates, and I have made separate local copies of the repo for testing master, staging, and core-updates. From 76b856f408728863bea40ff274f65c1820e0579f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Greg Hogan Date: Wed, 23 Dec 2020 20:50:55 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] gnu: openblas: Update to 0.3.13. * gnu/packages/maths.scm (openblas): Update to 0.3.13. --- gnu/packages/maths.scm | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/gnu/packages/maths.scm b/gnu/packages/maths.scm index b1680db063..3120bfcbac 100644 --- a/gnu/packages/maths.scm +++ b/gnu/packages/maths.scm @@ -3628,7 +3628,7 @@ parts of it.") (define-public openblas (package (name "openblas") - (version "0.3.10") + (version "0.3.13") (source (origin (method git-fetch) @@ -3638,7 +3638,7 @@ parts of it.") (file-name (git-file-name name version)) (sha256 (base32 - "174id98ga82bhz2v7sy9yj6pqy0h0088p3mkdikip69p9rh3d17b")))) + "14jxh0v3jfbw4mfjx4mcz4dd51lyq7pqvh9k8dg94539ypzjr2lj")))) (build-system gnu-build-system) (arguments `(#:test-target "test" -- 2.29.2 On Tue, Dec 22, 2020 at 9:21 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi, > > Greg Hogan skribis: > > > For the core-updates branch. > > [...] > > > + (version "0.3.13") > > (source > > (origin > > (method url-fetch) > > @@ -3637,7 +3637,7 @@ parts of it.") > > (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz")) > > (sha256 > > (base32 > > - "14iz9xnrb9xiwgj84j94mc74gg0zn2vsy9fmsijxxma1n7dck4w3")))) > > + "09rx33yaa48lwsdd1yyvzfgfpzjmjzldkzgn751qbpqdp42ba8wj")))) > > I get: > > --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- > sha256 hash mismatch for > /gnu/store/01vmivah7fwf5q16zpbybnbq2mqrz9w2-openblas-0.3.13-checkout: > expected hash: 09rx33yaa48lwsdd1yyvzfgfpzjmjzldkzgn751qbpqdp42ba8wj > actual hash: 14jxh0v3jfbw4mfjx4mcz4dd51lyq7pqvh9k8dg94539ypzjr2lj > hash mismatch for store item > '/gnu/store/01vmivah7fwf5q16zpbybnbq2mqrz9w2-openblas-0.3.13-checkout' > --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- > > Could you take a look and see if this is because the Git tag was changed > in place? > > Also, ‘core-updates’ is now at 0.3.10 so the patch didn’t apply out of > the box. > > Thanks, > Ludo’. >