From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from mp0 ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by ms11 with LMTPS id QLA2LgKAFmD1CgAA0tVLHw (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:01:38 +0000 Received: from aspmx1.migadu.com ([2001:41d0:2:4a6f::]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits)) by mp0 with LMTPS id wFAVKgKAFmAoHgAA1q6Kng (envelope-from ) for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:01:38 +0000 Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by aspmx1.migadu.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 626E99404C7 for ; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:01:38 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost ([::1]:38550 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l69Y0-0008OH-U0 for larch@yhetil.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 05:01:36 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52978) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l69XX-0008O1-QG for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 05:01:08 -0500 Received: from pat.zlotemysli.pl ([37.59.186.212]:44832) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l69XU-0000Ct-DK for guix-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 31 Jan 2021 05:01:07 -0500 Received: (qmail 2720 invoked by uid 1009); 31 Jan 2021 11:00:55 +0100 Received: from 188.123.215.55 (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat.zlotemysli.pl (envelope-from , uid 1002) with qmail-scanner-2.08st (clamdscan: 0.98.6/26065. spamassassin: 3.4.0. perlscan: 2.08st. Clear:RC:1(188.123.215.55):. Processed in 0.017161 secs); 31 Jan 2021 10:00:55 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO localhost) (kuba@kadziolka.net@188.123.215.55) by pat.zlotemysli.pl with SMTP; 31 Jan 2021 11:00:55 +0100 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: branch staging updated (5aeee07 -> 104151f) From: =?utf-8?q?Jakub_K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka?= To: "Leo Famulari" , "Mark H Weaver" Date: Sun, 31 Jan 2021 10:59:58 +0100 Message-Id: In-Reply-To: Received-SPF: none client-ip=37.59.186.212; envelope-from=kuba@kadziolka.net; helo=pat.zlotemysli.pl X-Spam_score_int: -18 X-Spam_score: -1.9 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.9 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_NONE=0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: guix-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org, mail@nicolasgoaziou.fr Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+larch=yhetil.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" X-Migadu-Flow: FLOW_IN X-Migadu-Spam-Score: -1.35 Authentication-Results: aspmx1.migadu.com; dkim=none; dmarc=none; spf=pass (aspmx1.migadu.com: domain of guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org designates 209.51.188.17 as permitted sender) smtp.mailfrom=guix-devel-bounces@gnu.org X-Migadu-Queue-Id: 626E99404C7 X-Spam-Score: -1.35 X-Migadu-Scanner: scn1.migadu.com X-TUID: qJ6ZM5nuzXYM On Sun Jan 31, 2021 at 6:18 AM CET, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sat, Jan 30, 2021 at 06:37:11PM -0500, Mark H Weaver wrote: > > What would the Git hook do, precisely? The reason I ask is that some > > bug fixes are appropriate on a frozen branch. How would a Git hook > > determine whether a given commit should be allowed? > > I haven't given much thought to how it would work but, if it ran on the > client side as a pre-push hook, it could be easily disabled by the > committer, when necessary. Alternatively, one could include some control sequence in the commit message. For example, Allow-Frozen: staging Regards, Jakub K=C4=85dzio=C5=82ka