From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: John Soo Subject: Re: Overhauling the cargo-build-system Date: Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:23:22 -0800 Message-ID: References: <87pngkpaa7.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:34551) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ihzWJ-0005kR-1L for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:23:27 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ihzWH-00080i-Bg for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:23:26 -0500 Received: from mail-oi1-x22f.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::22f]:37889) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ihzWG-0007vL-U6 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 12:23:25 -0500 Received: by mail-oi1-x22f.google.com with SMTP id l9so573243oii.5 for ; Thu, 19 Dec 2019 09:23:24 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <87pngkpaa7.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: =?utf-8?Q?Ludovic_Court=C3=A8s?= Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Hi all, I am working on ripgrep and I was wondering if we could add a key to inputs f= or cargo inputs instead of using the arguments field. Is there a downside t= o saying something like=20 `(inputs (("rust-loom" ,rust-loom-0.2 #rust-build) ("rust-quickcheck" ,rust-quickcheck-0.9 #rust-dev)) Just a thought I had so I could be wrong. I certainly see the downside of no= t using the inputs fields the way they work everywhere else. Thanks, John=