From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Efraim Flashner <efraim@flashner.co.il>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: Add sslh.
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2016 13:52:04 +0000
Message-ID: <C727F816-C1D9-4FE9-923E-4BA4B4C9BF13@flashner.co.il>
References: <1473640328-28092-1-git-send-email-me@tobias.gr>
	<20160912100334.GA24630@macbook42.flashner.co.il>
	<5c6e00fb-8105-27f2-a9a7-17eee6a56548@tobias.gr>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain;
 charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46672)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <efraim@flashner.co.il>) id 1bjReq-0004Lz-Ih
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:52:28 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <efraim@flashner.co.il>) id 1bjRel-0003qC-Lk
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:52:23 -0400
Received: from flashner.co.il ([178.62.234.194]:36749)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <efraim@flashner.co.il>) id 1bjRel-0003oS-EH
	for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 12 Sep 2016 09:52:19 -0400
In-Reply-To: <5c6e00fb-8105-27f2-a9a7-17eee6a56548@tobias.gr>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
	<guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
	<mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel" <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tobias.gr>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

You don't need both the asterisk and the underscore for the lambda. I'm n=
ot sure of the guile reason, but when you have a 'let*' then you use 'lam=
bda'. For setenv or zero, for example, you'd use 'lambda _'


On September 12, 2016 3:33:42 PM GMT+03:00, Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <me@tob=
ias.gr> wrote:
>Efraim,
>
>Thanks!
>
>On 12/09/16 12:03, Efraim Flashner wrote:
>>> +                     (lambda* _
>>                                 ^^^
>>                Don't need the underscore here
>
>I don't see how that could work. Did you mean to drop the asterisk?
>If not, I'll need a bit more info.
>
>>             return #t on the substitute
>
>Done.
>
>> Is the name specifically lowercase? Otherwise it should be a capital
>S,
>> and again a few lines down.
>
>Yes. See the README.
>
>Now, grepping reveals a single =E2=80=98Sslh=E2=80=99 in there, but all =
other instances
>are lowercase. That seems to be the preferred form. I have no
>preference
>in the matter.
>
>Kind regards,
>
>T G-R

--=20
Sent from my Android device with K-9 Mail. Please excuse my brevity.