From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Brian Woodcox Subject: Re: guixsd 0.15.0 install failure Date: Fri, 2 Nov 2018 22:49:33 -0600 Message-ID: References: <1114E3F0-AC24-4655-8B4F-D562EDBD85B7@inskydata.com> <87sh0iak2i.fsf@netris.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34092) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIntc-00007f-OY for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 00:50:53 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIntX-0005WC-0z for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 00:50:52 -0400 Received: from mail.inskydata.com ([184.68.229.6]:35918 helo=server.inskydata.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gIntW-0005KN-MM for help-guix@gnu.org; Sat, 03 Nov 2018 00:50:46 -0400 Received: from [192.168.34.148] (unknown [192.168.34.148]) by server.inskydata.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id EA56D425784F for ; Fri, 2 Nov 2018 22:50:09 -0600 (MDT) In-Reply-To: <87sh0iak2i.fsf@netris.org> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: help-guix@gnu.org Thanks Mark. Will do. Being knew to Guix I wasn=E2=80=99t aware of the guix download com= mand. > On Nov 2, 2018, at 9:58 PM, Mark H Weaver wrote: >=20 > Brian Woodcox writes: >=20 >> I posted before I saw Leo=E2=80=99s reply at any rate his method is proba= bly better. >>=20 >> In my case, from the /gnu/store directory, I entered: >>=20 >> nano ./59pqd1d0ihqxx0i64yxk335vjmw78wmh-bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz.drv >>=20 >> and at the end of the line, I changed url from http://www.bzip.org/1.0.6/= bzip2-1.0.6.tar.gz to >> https://github.com/past-due/bzip2-mirror/releases/download/v1.0.6/bzip2-1= .0.6.tar.gz >=20 > It's important to never edit files in /gnu/store. Everything in that > directory is assumed to be immutable, and if that assumption is > violated, Guix may later misbehave in non-obvious ways. >=20 > Please use Leo's method instead. >=20 > Thanks, > Mark