From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Petter Subject: Re: [PATCH] gnu: go: Update to 1.8.1 Date: Mon, 17 Apr 2017 20:28:57 +0200 Message-ID: <9a7877888c2f572047bcfd4c4ccdcc77@mykolab.ch> References: <7f4cf1ee6c558899e8c9457102c2e0d4@mykolab.ch> <20170417135418.0bf12c87@sf> <1e60418d89b070a52d90ef4b3f08eba3@mykolab.ch> <20170417171822.GA8224@jasmine> <20170417181839.GA24114@jasmine> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:56002) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0BOc-00033L-Hq for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:29:07 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0BOX-0005xK-Iu for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:29:06 -0400 Received: from mx.kolabnow.com ([95.128.36.1]:44574 helo=mx-out03.mykolab.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d0BOX-0005wT-BE for guix-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 17 Apr 2017 14:29:01 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20170417181839.GA24114@jasmine> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: Leo Famulari Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org Thanks Leo! On 2017-04-17 20:18, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Mon, Apr 17, 2017 at 07:55:35PM +0200, Petter wrote: >> Hi Leo, >> >> Good point! As the build succeeded I didn't think any of it. This >> could be >> important for other architectures than what Sergei and I are using. >> >> However, >> > find /tmp/go/src/cmd/ -name '*asm\.c*' >> doesn't return any file. Looks like they've removed these files. I'm >> pretty >> sure they're working to "free" their source of C code, so I wouldn't >> expect >> these files to reappear in a later release either. > > Indeed, I must have been looking at an old version of the Go source > tree. > >> With this information I think it's safe to remove the asm.c >> substitution. > > Yup! I pushed the update as c04ef86e8114225f5e5859f379582ba6f69aacfb.