From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: swedebugia Subject: Re: sha256 hash mismatch Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2018 17:06:29 +0100 Message-ID: <99bc1728-8a95-b3ac-1595-f2a0f77b6236@riseup.net> References: <87tvkaga1b.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:38892) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPVA0-0007x4-U0 for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:15:29 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPUvb-00084c-EF for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:00:45 -0500 Received: from mx1.riseup.net ([198.252.153.129]:55977) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gPUvb-00081d-5I for help-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 21 Nov 2018 11:00:35 -0500 In-Reply-To: <87tvkaga1b.fsf@gmail.com> Content-Language: sv-FI List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Fredrik Salomonsson Cc: help-guix On 2018-11-21 08:33, Fredrik Salomonsson wrote: > swedebugia writes: snip > > Put berlin first in the --substitute-urls and did a guix pull to one > commit that had the most packages built. Using > http://berlin.guixsd.org/jobset/guix-master to pick out the commit. > > The install took less than 20min on my x220. Thanks for all the help! :D Great that you got past the init state. > > Though I needed to manually hack the grub.cfg to be able to > boot. Otherwise it wouldn't find the kernel. > > Now it get stuck when trying to mount the filesystem. Backtrace shows > it's failing in ./gnu/build/file-system.scm 613:6 > > Might have something misconfigured in my config file. Anyways that's not > what this thread is about. If I cannot figure it out I'll send another > email. > > Thanks again for the help! > Installing a simpler config.scm and going incrementally forward with small changes might be worth considering. Especially given that our guix/guile error messages can sometimes be quite cryptic if you dont know exactly what change caused the error. -- Cheers Swedebugia