From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Leo Famulari Subject: Re: Freezing core-updates Date: Tue, 17 May 2016 07:29:46 -0400 Message-ID: <9969BE5D-B436-415A-9819-9D09DCA6076A@famulari.name> References: <87h9dxukjm.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34843) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2dCU-0001oU-0l for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2016 07:30:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2dCO-0007Ww-RY for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2016 07:30:08 -0400 Received: from out5-smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.29]:53749) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1b2dCN-0007T8-D8 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 17 May 2016 07:30:04 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87h9dxukjm.fsf@gnu.org> List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-devel" To: ludo@gnu.org, Guix-devel Oh, I was just working on yesterday's new release of tar (1.29). I guess it will wait for the next cycle? Sorry for the top-post... -------- Original Message -------- From: ludo@gnu.org Sent: May 17, 2016 4:59:41 AM EDT To: Guix-devel Subject: Freezing core-updates Hello Guix! I hereby declare ‘core-updates’ frozen! :-) That is, we should now work towards fixing the “core” packages, then make Hydra build everything, fix packages, and finally merge it. I invite you all to spend a bit of time on it, it’s fun and profitable. :-) Currently, the main problem is a frightening GCC 5.3 build issue on ARM: : --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- make[3]: Leaving directory '/tmp/nix-build-gcc-5.3.0.drv-0/build' Comparing stages 2 and 3 warning: gcc/cc1plus-checksum.o differs warning: gcc/cc1-checksum.o differs Bootstrap comparison failure! gcc/fold-const.o differs gcc/cp/semantics.o differs gcc/cp/optimize.o differs gcc/dwarf2cfi.o differs gcc/tree-ssa-sccvn.o differs gcc/real.o differs gcc/libgcov-driver-tool.o differs gcc/tree-nested.o differs gcc/lto-section-out.o differs gcc/c/c-typeck.o differs gcc/c/c-parser.o differs gcc/lto-streamer-out.o differs gcc/tree-dfa.o differs gcc/ipa-inline.o differs gcc/c-family/cilk.o differs gcc/gcov-dump.o differs gcc/coverage.o differs gcc/tree-inline.o differs gcc/omp-low.o differs gcc/double-int.o differs gcc/tree-ssa-math-opts.o differs gcc/simplify-rtx.o differs gcc/df-scan.o differs gcc/tree-switch-conversion.o differs libiberty/fibheap.o differs libiberty/simple-object-xcoff.o differs libiberty/sort.o differs libiberty/pic/fibheap.o differs libiberty/pic/simple-object-xcoff.o differs libiberty/pic/sort.o differs Makefile:21400: recipe for target 'compare' failed make[2]: *** [compare] Error 1 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Can someone with an ARM machine reproduce it? I wonder if it could be a hardware failure. See for more. Ludo’.