From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:50133) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYov8-0001Ak-0e for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:06:09 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYov4-00008g-PV for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:06:06 -0500 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:33355) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1eYov4-00008S-LY for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:06:02 -0500 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1eYov4-0007FI-4J for guix-patches@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Jan 2018 03:06:02 -0500 Subject: [bug#30034] [PATCH] Update guile-bytestructures to 1.0.1. Resent-Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Tue, 09 Jan 2018 09:05:53 +0100 From: Amirouche Boubekki In-Reply-To: <20180108232524.vaovlxmm7oj2abrm@abyayala> References: <88cbda9d7e246e6ae4eaaebcbcc8b777@hypermove.net> <1de49c11cb37e97b172ca3be5fdc27e3@hypermove.net> <20180108232524.vaovlxmm7oj2abrm@abyayala> Message-ID: <94054a194bfadb98e25c6c756012acaf@hypermove.net> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: guix-patches-bounces+kyle=kyleam.com@gnu.org Sender: "Guix-patches" To: ng0 Cc: 30034@debbugs.gnu.org On 2018-01-09 00:25, ng0 wrote: > > I'm sceptic about the change of the build system together with the > update. > There must be a reason we used trivial-build-system in Guix, or is it > just that the software had no proper tooling for builds until 1.0 and > 1.0.1? The project was non autotols previously. It's the first patch that can use it.