From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: Ellen Papsch <ellen.papsch@wine-logistix.de>
Subject: Re: Wisdom regarding packaging proxysql
Date: Thu, 06 Feb 2020 09:55:29 +0100
Message-ID: <92ffe3ced00113038aec68c0aae5233e3606a070.camel@wine-logistix.de>
References: <14c5fb54e7130c85981e2240564f151292e3cc27.camel@wine-logistix.de>
 <20200205202341.GB6380@jasmine.lan>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52947)
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
 (envelope-from <ellen.papsch@wine-logistix.de>) id 1izcwi-0008Ip-GB
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 03:55:37 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
 (envelope-from <ellen.papsch@wine-logistix.de>) id 1izcwe-0000ol-GK
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 03:55:35 -0500
Received: from dedi718.your-server.de ([78.46.1.118]:46948)
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32)
 (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <ellen.papsch@wine-logistix.de>)
 id 1izcwe-0000er-7i
 for guix-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 06 Feb 2020 03:55:32 -0500
In-Reply-To: <20200205202341.GB6380@jasmine.lan>
List-Id: "Development of GNU Guix and the GNU System distribution."
 <guix-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:guix-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guix-devel>,
 <mailto:guix-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Sender: "Guix-devel"
 <guix-devel-bounces+gcggd-guix-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
To: Leo Famulari <leo@famulari.name>
Cc: guix-devel@gnu.org

Am Mittwoch, den 05.02.2020, 15:23 -0500 schrieb Leo Famulari:
> 
> It's not uncommon to see hard-coded installation prefixes. What else
> would need to be changed? Is it doable?

All dependencies are statically linked to the binary. I'll have to trim
down the build steps to just mariadb-connector-c. Additionally, I'll
have to patch include and library directories. It's very much doable.
As Jussi Pakkanen from meson recently said in a talk, it's hard as in
tedious rather than complicated. I'll jump in.

> > mariadb-connector-c [...]
> 
> Agreed, this is a fork.
> 
> > [...]
> 
> I think that's the right idea: use the upstream patches on our
> jemalloc package.

Thanks for your input!

Best regards