From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Thomas Danckaert Subject: Re: prevent gc of texlive-...-texmf.tar.xz Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 17:21:48 +0100 Message-ID: <90fc7408793e133277a7e9cf4e412256@thomasdanckaert.be> References: <20200212.135345.176088053800652108.post@thomasdanckaert.be> <20200212204505.GB17839@jasmine.lan> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:52632) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HFk-0002EF-K4 for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:22:13 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HFi-00030X-3z for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:22:11 -0500 Received: from s02.spamexperts.axc.nl ([185.182.56.112]:51737) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1j2HFh-0002qk-Tr for help-guix@gnu.org; Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:22:10 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20200212204505.GB17839@jasmine.lan> List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: help-guix-bounces+gcggh-help-guix=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sender: "Help-Guix" To: Leo Famulari Cc: help-guix@gnu.org On 2020-02-12 21:45, Leo Famulari wrote: > The simplest way to make a gcroot is to symlink the store item into > /var/guix/gcroots. > > In fact, I've had this exact symlink for a few years now: > > lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 73 Aug 5 2017 texlive-20170524-texmf.tar.xz > -> > /gnu/store/5rnvmy02yazy8iwaa91kijbbqp8qmflz-texlive-20170524-texmf.tar.xz Ah, thanks, that should do it! I wondered if I was the only one with this problem. @Zimoun: texlive-texmf.tar.xz is only a build input of texlive, so it can be gc'ed even when texlive is installed in a profile. As far as I remember, updates to texlive often seem to require the original texmf tarball and apply patches to it (not sure how this works precisely -- somehow there are no substitutes for the patched/updated version of texlive-texmf?). Interesting that you saw 2 downloads of texlive-texmf (a 2.5GB nar file *and* the 2.5GB original tarball?). I don't understand why that happens (but even in this case, eliminating at least the tar.xz download saves a lot of time and bandwidth). Thank you! Thomas