From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Tim Gesthuizen Subject: bug#32458: Acknowledgement (SDL SEGFAULTs on foreign distro) Date: Wed, 10 Oct 2018 17:35:28 +0200 Message-ID: <8e38e782-a577-bcbd-0838-0efbc42a5f21@yahoo.de> References: <4990ca3b-560e-6049-4f54-d597bf8a2dc4@yahoo.de> <87ftz8pxde.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a7npiks2.fsf@fastmail.com> <28717b9b-bf01-cfe2-56d8-6be1cbbb1da8@yahoo.de> <875zyci980.fsf@fastmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fzUvtEeGZf4ElKBi3KwUnS02Q7d5rKpL5" Return-path: Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44408) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAGWw-0000KY-71 for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:36:11 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAGWq-0005KD-6V for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:36:10 -0400 Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:39440) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1gAGWo-0005JT-1p for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:36:02 -0400 Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1gAGWn-0000CP-Ks for bug-guix@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Oct 2018 11:36:01 -0400 Sender: "Debbugs-submit" Resent-Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <875zyci980.fsf@fastmail.com> List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sender: "bug-Guix" To: Marius Bakke , 32458@debbugs.gnu.org This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 4880 and 3156) --fzUvtEeGZf4ElKBi3KwUnS02Q7d5rKpL5 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="WQMcu3AMDKweZg7RgvbNr6hIIDw0J3ilQ"; protected-headers="v1" From: Tim Gesthuizen To: Marius Bakke , 32458@debbugs.gnu.org Message-ID: <8e38e782-a577-bcbd-0838-0efbc42a5f21@yahoo.de> Subject: Re: bug#32458: Acknowledgement (SDL SEGFAULTs on foreign distro) References: <4990ca3b-560e-6049-4f54-d597bf8a2dc4@yahoo.de> <87ftz8pxde.fsf@fastmail.com> <87a7npiks2.fsf@fastmail.com> <28717b9b-bf01-cfe2-56d8-6be1cbbb1da8@yahoo.de> <875zyci980.fsf@fastmail.com> In-Reply-To: <875zyci980.fsf@fastmail.com> --WQMcu3AMDKweZg7RgvbNr6hIIDw0J3ilQ Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 08.10.2018 20:28, Marius Bakke wrote: > If reverting did not help, I doubt rebasing it away will do a > difference. It also sounds very tedious! I stopped rebasing. It was too tedious. > Have you been able to find a commit that definitely works? Say, > 0dd91619a597b52bcb5d6d1bb675a9eb65242c44 (0.14)? Now that you have a I could verify that this commit also works. > 0dd91619a597b52bcb5d6d1bb675a9eb65242c44 (0.14)? Now that you have a > good test case, it should be easier to script the bisect (just make sur= e > to invoke "make clean && make" between runs to avoid ABI issues). But I have bisected already :) On 22.08.2018, Tim Gesthuizen wrote: > This bisect passed without a single skip. It reports that the bug was > first introduced by 5318b103ff277efbac248a066d162589a9083baa (which is > the first commit after a larger merge). Maybe you missed that mail. The problem is that reverting the commit does not solve the bug on the current master branch. So I am searching for a good way of finding another bug through bisecting. This would mean that I would need to apply a patch of some form to make sure that the libepoxy problem is fixed before running the bisect script again. This is why I tried to rebase the master branch to not include commits updating libepoxy. I hope my problem is more clear now. Maybe there is another way that is just too obvious and simple. If you don't have a good idea on how to do it, I will do the bisect again and do an input rewriting for the package I am building to use the old libepoxy and not the one of that revision. This will probably involve tons of package rebuilding so I am open for other approaches. Tim. --WQMcu3AMDKweZg7RgvbNr6hIIDw0J3ilQ-- --fzUvtEeGZf4ElKBi3KwUnS02Q7d5rKpL5 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCgAdFiEEKUiC5+8BRKEri5fa0uWPaa77GdUFAlu+HEcACgkQ0uWPaa77 GdWEdAf/Y8RgVmvn/um8QX44uvLs9IKjVQQUQ8a2M7UWR+dVBy46WAim3DSGC7yT wVY8X7dqaRz8u+7iZHyYyLl+CARqP7sfeVCEd8hSCR4MggqJ1TBLxYK+SyN6rxQg 1iPkTbYzAllmraL0pv/GHt8mlYEm+4wQbyo0QoSOfq5vONkhaNF3UyQ23nv/hkDB jHvGEz3pUZHHiiGiBgdX7PcR+7jRPFNKsV8Hf7zlSDPRi2QbrGDgP0TjpSWKN6l2 g8QMfgqIPx4PHf9kcZ7oyBwaMVZ6XgUQXekIcvBzk0UftlicKNnbp+sCVFlfu7yP SFs8GWuWVHXgfPCX4tjx4so/Qq5I6g== =w8MV -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fzUvtEeGZf4ElKBi3KwUnS02Q7d5rKpL5--