From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
From: swedebugia <swedebugia@riseup.net>
Subject: bug#33235: Bzip hash error
Date: Mon, 5 Nov 2018 17:21:57 +0100
Message-ID: <8e013510-41a7-4809-70a4-b6698733bbf2@riseup.net>
References: <756a584906ca9c9a577040677995b194@posteo.net>
	<20181102021701.GB19111@jasmine.lan>
	<d0d03b79be6d28b6302de4a7696b5134@posteo.net>
	<20181102030929.GA25826@jasmine.lan>
	<893aa3e7-8539-c515-bdd0-8c92da9a5e20@riseup.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path: <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:44094)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gJheb-0000kL-Tc
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:23:06 -0500
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gJheY-0002DE-NB
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:23:05 -0500
Received: from debbugs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.43]:59459)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16)
	(Exim 4.71) (envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>)
	id 1gJheY-0002CO-96
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:23:02 -0500
Received: from Debian-debbugs by debbugs.gnu.org with local (Exim 4.84_2)
	(envelope-from <Debian-debbugs@debbugs.gnu.org>) id 1gJheY-0004rB-1Y
	for bug-guix@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Nov 2018 11:23:02 -0500
Sender: "Debbugs-submit" <debbugs-submit-bounces@debbugs.gnu.org>
Resent-Message-ID: <handler.33235.B33235.154143492618589@debbugs.gnu.org>
In-Reply-To: <893aa3e7-8539-c515-bdd0-8c92da9a5e20@riseup.net>
Content-Language: en-US
List-Id: Bug reports for GNU Guix <bug-guix.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/bug-guix/>
List-Post: <mailto:bug-guix@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/bug-guix>,
	<mailto:bug-guix-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org
Sender: "bug-Guix" <bug-guix-bounces+gcggb-bug-guix=m.gmane.org@gnu.org>
To: 33235@debbugs.gnu.org, leo@famulari.name, brettg@posteo.net


On 2018-11-02 14:40, swedebugia wrote:
> Hi
>
> On 2018-11-02 04:09, Leo Famulari wrote:
>> No, I recommend against doing `guix pull` before initializing. We test
>> that the installer works, but if you update Guix before initialization,
>> then you void the warranty
> I suggest we state this VERY clearly in the manual.

Actually guix very loudly warns the user that running guix system init 
before guix pull will downgrade guix.

I solved this by pulling the 0.15 commit and then init.

I suggest we tell binary install users to do this in the manual.

What do you think?

-- 
Cheers
Swedebugia